How to Present Accessibility Scoring Improvements
Accessibility scoring improvements are more than just numbersâthey tell a story about how your product is becoming more inclusive. Whether youâre reporting to senior leadership, presenting to a design team, or demoing to a client, the way you frame those scores can make the difference between a fleeting acknowledgment and a lasting commitment to accessibility.
In this guide weâll cover:
- The why behind accessibility scoring
- How to clean and structure your data
- Visual and narrative techniques that resonate
- A stepâbyâstep checklist you can copyâpaste
- Doâs and donâts for flawless presentations
- Realâworld examples and a mini case study
- FAQs that address the most common doubts
By the end youâll have a repeatable process that turns raw scores into compelling, actionâoriented stories.
Why Accessibility Scoring Matters
Stakeholders often ask, âWhat does a 78% WCAG score actually mean for our business?â The answer lies in linking scores to risk, cost, and brand reputation.
- Risk mitigation â A study by the Ponemon Institute found that dataârelated accessibility lawsuits cost companies an average of $2.5âŻmillion per case.âŻSource.
- Market reach â Over 1âŻbillion people worldwide have a disability. Improving accessibility can unlock a sizable market segment.âŻWorld Health Organization.
- SEO boost â Google treats wellâstructured, accessible sites as higher quality, often resulting in a 10â15% lift in organic traffic.âŻGoogle Search Central.
When you present scores, tie them directly to these business outcomes. Thatâs the secret sauce that turns a compliance report into a strategic asset.
Understanding Common Scoring Systems
System | Scale | Typical Benchmarks | What It Measures |
---|---|---|---|
WCAG 2.1 Conformance | 0â100% | 90%+ = Good, <70% = Needs Work | Success criteria across Perceivable, Operable, Understandable, Robust |
A11Y Score (WebAIM) | 0â100% | 80%+ = Acceptable | Automated test coverage (color contrast, ARIA, etc.) |
Accessibility Insights | 0â100% | 85%+ = Strong | Mix of automated + manual checks |
Definition: Scoring is the quantitative representation of how many accessibility criteria a site meets. It is not a guarantee of perfect user experience, but a useful proxy for progress.
Understanding the scale helps you decide which visual metaphors (traffic lights, thermometers, progress bars) will be most intuitive for your audience.
Preparing Your Data for Presentation
- Collect raw results from tools such as the ATS Resume Checker, Lighthouse, or manual audits.
- Normalize scores to a common 0â100 scale. If you have a mix of percentages and raw counts, convert everything to percentages for consistency.
- Add context â annotate each score with the date, page URL, and test environment (desktop, mobile, screen reader).
- Calculate trends â use a simple moving average (3âmonth window) to smooth out outliers.
- Segment â break down scores by product area (e.g., homepage, checkout, admin panel) or by user persona (visionâimpaired, motorâimpaired).
Quick DataâPrep Checklist
- Export CSV from each testing tool
- Remove duplicate entries
- Convert all metrics to %
- Tag each row with
page
,date
,device
- Generate a trend column (e.g.,
30âday avg
)
Having clean, segmented data makes the next stepâvisualizationâmuch smoother.
Visualizing Scores for Maximum Impact
1. Choose the Right Chart Type
Goal | Best Chart | Why |
---|---|---|
Show overall health | Gauge / Speedometer | Instantly conveys âgood vs. badâ with a single glance |
Compare sections | Bar chart | Highlights relative performance across pages |
Show progress over time | Line chart | Emphasizes trend direction |
Highlight gaps | Heat map | Colorâcoded severity draws attention to problem areas |
2. Use Color Strategically
- Green (â„90%) â Success
- Yellow (70â89%) â Caution
- Red (<70%) â Immediate action needed
Avoid overly bright hues that can trigger visual fatigue; stick to a palette that meets WCAG contrast ratios (â„4.5:1 for normal text).
3. Add Narrative Callouts
Instead of a plain number, pair it with a short insight:
Example: âOur checkout page improved from 62% to 78% after fixing focus order â a 16âpoint jump that reduces cart abandonment risk by an estimated 4%.â
4. Embed Interactive Elements (Optional)
If youâre presenting in a webâbased dashboard, consider embedding a Resumly Chrome Extension that lets stakeholders hover over a score to see the underlying issues.
Storytelling Techniques That Stick
- Start with the âWhyâ â Open with a user story. âMaria, a screenâreader user, struggled to locate the âApplyâ button, causing a 30âsecond delay.â
- Show the âBeforeâ â Use a screenshot or a lowâfidelity mockup with red highlights.
- Present the âAfterâ â Show the same view with improvements, overlay the new score, and add a brief impact statement.
- Quantify the Benefit â Translate the score jump into business metrics (e.g., conversion lift, support ticket reduction).
- End with a Call to Action â Assign owners, set a target score, and schedule the next review.
Tip: Keep each slide or section under 2â3 minutes to maintain audience attention.
StepâbyâStep Guide to Crafting Your Presentation
- Define the audience â Executives need ROI; developers need technical details.
- Select the scope â Choose 3â5 highâimpact pages rather than the entire site.
- Gather data â Run automated scans, supplement with manual testing.
- Create visuals â Use PowerPoint, Google Slides, or a live dashboard.
- Write narrative â Follow the âBefore â After â Impactâ template.
- Add internal links â For deeper dives, link to Resumly resources:
- Learn how AI can autoâgenerate inclusive copy with the AI Cover Letter feature.
- Test your own resumeâs accessibility using the Resume Readability Test.
- Explore keyword optimization with the Job Search Keywords tool.
- Rehearse â Practice answering likely questions (see FAQ below).
- Deliver â Use a remote clicker, keep eye contact, and pause for questions.
Doâs and Donâts Checklist
â Do | â Donât |
---|---|
Use plain language â avoid jargon like âARIAâhiddenâ unless the audience is technical. | Overload slides with raw CSV tables. |
Show trend lines â people love seeing progress. | Present a single static score without context. |
Highlight actionable next steps â assign owners and deadlines. | Leave the audience guessing what to do next. |
Include real user quotes â they humanize the data. | Rely solely on automated scores â they miss nuanced issues. |
Maintain WCAGâcompliant colors in your own deck. | Use lowâcontrast color combos that defeat the purpose. |
Tools & Resources (Powered by Resumly)
- AI Resume Builder â Craft inclusive resumes that pass ATS checks.
- ATS Resume Checker â Validate that your own career documents are accessible.
- Career Guide â Learn how accessibility expertise can boost your job prospects.
- Buzzword Detector â Ensure your accessibility reports avoid vague buzzwords.
- Networking CoâPilot â Connect with accessibility advocates and mentors.
These tools not only help you present improvements but also drive them.
Mini Case Study: EâCommerce Checkout Revamp
Background â An online retailer scored 62% on its checkout page (WCAG 2.1). Customer support logged 1,200 accessibilityârelated tickets in Q1.
Intervention â The UX team applied the following fixes:
- Added visible focus indicators (contrast ratio 5:1).
- Reâordered form fields for logical tab flow.
- Provided ARIA labels for error messages.
Result â Postâimplementation score rose to 78%. Support tickets dropped by 45%, and checkout conversion increased by 3.2% (estimated $250k revenue uplift).
Presentation Highlights â The team used a before/after heat map, a line chart showing the 16âpoint jump, and a user quote from a visually impaired shopper. The executive board approved a budget for a fullâsite audit.
Frequently Asked Questions
- What is the best frequency for reporting accessibility scores?
- Quarterly reviews are common, but highârisk pages should be monitored monthly.
- Should I include automated and manual scores together?
- Yes. Show automated scores for breadth and manual scores for depth; explain the difference.
- How do I handle a low score on a critical page?
- Highlight the risk, propose a remediation timeline, and assign a dedicated owner.
- Can I use the same template for all products?
- A core template works, but tailor the narrative to each productâs user base.
- Do I need to disclose the testing tool used?
- Transparency builds trust. Mention the tool (e.g., WebAIM, axe, Resumly ATS Checker) and its limitations.
- How do I convince leadership to invest in accessibility?
- Tie score improvements to ROI metrics: reduced support costs, higher conversion, legal risk mitigation.
- Is a 100% score realistic?
- While technically possible, a perfect score rarely reflects realâworld usability. Aim for continuous improvement.
- Where can I find more guidance on inclusive design?
- Check out the Resumly Career Guide and the WebAIM blog for deep dives.
Conclusion: Making Accessibility Scoring Improvements Stick
Presenting accessibility scoring improvements isnât just about flashing numbers on a slide. Itâs about context, visualization, and storytelling that turn data into decisive action. By following the checklist, using the right charts, and weaving user narratives, youâll ensure that every stakeholderânot just the accessibility teamâunderstands the value of a more inclusive product.
Ready to put these tactics into practice? Explore Resumlyâs suite of AIâpowered tools to streamline your reporting and keep your scores climbing. Visit the Resumly homepage to get started today.