Ace Your Chemistry Interview
Master technical, safety, and behavioral questions with expert answers and proven strategies.
- Comprehensive technical and behavioral question bank
- STAR‑based model answers for each question
- Competency weighting to focus study effort
- Tips to avoid common interview pitfalls
- Downloadable practice PDF for timed mock sessions
Technical Knowledge
In my undergraduate research I needed to separate volatile organic compounds from a complex mixture.
Select an appropriate separation technique that provides high resolution for volatile analytes.
I chose gas chromatography because the compounds had low boiling points and were thermally stable, allowing rapid separation on a non‑polar column with a temperature program.
The GC run resolved all target peaks within 5 minutes, enabling accurate quantification and saving instrument time compared to HPLC.
- What detector would you pair with GC for trace analysis?
- How do you handle non‑volatile compounds?
- Clarity of principle explanation
- Appropriate justification for technique choice
- Relevance of example
- Confusing GC with LC fundamentals
- Choosing GC for thermally labile compounds
- Describe chromatography basics
- Differentiate GC vs LC based on volatility and thermal stability
- Provide a concrete example
During a formulation project I needed a buffer at pH 7.4 for a protein assay.
Calculate the ratio of conjugate base to acid to achieve the target pH.
I applied the Henderson‑Hasselbalch equation, pH = pKa + log([A⁻]/[HA]), using the pKa of phosphate (7.2) to determine a 1.58:1 ratio, then mixed the appropriate amounts of Na₂HPO₄ and NaH₂PO₄.
The resulting buffer maintained pH 7.4 ±0.05 over 24 hours, ensuring assay reproducibility.
- How would you adjust the buffer if temperature changes?
- What limitations does the equation have?
- Correct equation usage
- Accurate calculation demonstration
- Practical preparation steps
- Incorrect pKa value
- Ignoring temperature effect
- State equation
- Identify pKa of chosen acid‑base pair
- Show calculation of ratio
- Describe preparation steps
After synthesizing a new ester in the organic lab, I needed to confirm its purity before scale‑up.
Use ¹H NMR to assess impurity levels and verify structural integrity.
I recorded a high‑resolution ¹H NMR spectrum, integrated peaks corresponding to the ester’s methylene and methyl groups, and compared them to the expected pattern. Any extraneous peaks were quantified by integration relative to an internal standard.
The spectrum showed >98 % purity with only trace solvent peaks, allowing me to proceed to the next reaction step confidently.
- What additional NMR experiments could you run for structural confirmation?
- How would you handle overlapping peaks?
- Understanding of NMR basics
- Correct use of integration for purity
- Recognition of solvent/residual peaks
- Misinterpreting peak multiplicity
- Failing to mention internal standard
- Explain sample preparation
- Identify key peaks for target compound
- Use integration to quantify impurities
- Conclude on purity level
In a polymer chemistry internship I was tasked with reporting the DP of a poly(ethylene terephthalate) batch.
Convert the measured Mn to DP using the monomer repeat unit weight.
I divided the Mn (45,000 g mol⁻¹) by the molecular weight of the repeat unit (192 g mol⁻¹), yielding a DP of ~235.
The calculated DP matched the target specification, confirming successful polymerization and enabling downstream processing decisions.
- What factors could cause Mn to differ from the theoretical value?
- How would you determine polydispersity index (PDI)?
- Accurate formula usage
- Clear numerical example
- Awareness of practical considerations
- Using weight‑average instead of number‑average
- Neglecting end‑group contribution for low DP
- Define DP and Mn relationship
- Provide formula DP = Mn / M₀
- Insert example numbers
- Interpret result
Safety & Compliance
At my previous university lab I was involved in updating the CHP after a new reagent was introduced.
Identify and document essential CHP elements to ensure regulatory compliance and worker safety.
I ensured the plan included a chemical inventory, standard operating procedures, exposure limits, personal protective equipment requirements, waste disposal protocols, and emergency response procedures.
The revised CHP passed the institutional safety audit with no citations, and lab members reported increased confidence in handling hazardous chemicals.
- How do you keep the chemical inventory up to date?
- What steps would you take after a spill of a corrosive acid?
- Comprehensiveness of components
- Link to regulatory standards
- Practical examples
- Omitting emergency response
- List inventory, SOPs, exposure limits, PPE, waste, emergency response
- Explain regulatory basis (OSHA, EPA)
Our organic synthesis lab experienced frequent fume hood alarms due to solvent vapors.
Implement controls to minimize inhalation exposure.
I applied the hierarchy: first, substituted a high‑volatility solvent with a less volatile alternative (engineering control). When substitution wasn’t feasible, I upgraded the fume hood airflow and introduced local exhaust ventilation (engineering). I also reinforced PPE usage and provided training (administrative and PPE).
Airborne solvent concentrations dropped by 70 %, and the lab passed the annual industrial hygiene inspection without violations.
- What monitoring methods would you use to verify control effectiveness?
- If substitution isn’t possible, what’s the next best control?
- Correct hierarchy order
- Concrete example
- Quantified outcome
- Skipping elimination/substitution steps
- Define hierarchy (elimination, substitution, engineering, administrative, PPE)
- Describe specific actions taken
During a project I generated a mixed waste stream of dichloromethane and copper sulfate residues.
Develop a disposal protocol that meets hazardous waste regulations.
I first segregated the waste by phase separation, extracting the organic layer for collection as hazardous organic waste. The aqueous phase containing copper was neutralized, precipitated, and filtered. The solid copper salt was then sent to a licensed metal recycling facility, while the aqueous filtrate was treated to meet discharge limits before disposal.
All waste was disposed of in compliance with EPA RCRA guidelines, and the audit report showed zero non‑compliance findings.
- How would you handle a mixed waste that cannot be easily separated?
- What documentation is required for hazardous waste shipments?
- Understanding of segregation
- Regulatory compliance awareness
- Clear procedural steps
- Suggesting disposal in regular trash
- Phase separation
- Separate organic and aqueous streams
- Treat each according to regulations
Before initiating a novel organophosphorus synthesis, my supervisor required a formal risk assessment.
Identify hazards, evaluate risks, and propose mitigation measures.
I listed each reagent’s toxicity, consulted SDSs, evaluated exposure routes, and used a risk matrix to score severity and likelihood. Controls included using a certified fume hood, wearing double gloves, implementing spill kits, and scheduling a safety briefing. I documented the assessment in the lab’s risk register.
The experiment proceeded without incident, and the risk assessment was cited as a model during the department’s safety review.
- What factors influence the likelihood rating in a risk matrix?
- How often should the risk assessment be reviewed?
- Systematic approach
- Use of standard tools (SDS, matrix)
- Specific controls
- Skipping documentation
- Identify reagents and hazards
- Consult SDS
- Use risk matrix
- Define controls
- Document
Behavioral & Problem Solving
In my graduate research a Suzuki coupling yielded only starting material after 24 hours.
Identify the cause of failure and recover the project timeline.
I reviewed the reaction parameters, confirmed the palladium catalyst freshness, checked the base’s moisture content, and ran a small-scale test varying the solvent polarity. I discovered that residual water in the base quenched the catalyst. Replacing the base with a freshly dried version and adding molecular sieves restored activity.
The optimized reaction gave 85 % isolated yield, allowing me to meet the conference abstract deadline.
- How do you prioritize which variable to test first?
- What documentation do you keep during troubleshooting?
- Logical troubleshooting flow
- Technical accuracy
- Result orientation
- Blaming equipment without analysis
- State the failed reaction
- Systematic troubleshooting steps
- Identify root cause
- Implement solution and result
As a post‑doc I needed to ensure my project aligned with emerging green chemistry practices.
Develop a routine for continuous learning and knowledge sharing.
I subscribed to key journals (JACS, Green Chemistry), set up RSS alerts for relevant keywords, attended monthly webinars, and presented summaries at our lab meetings. I also participated in a professional society’s special interest group on sustainable synthesis.
My incorporation of a solvent‑free protocol reduced waste by 40 % and was later highlighted in the department’s annual report.
- What criteria do you use to evaluate the relevance of new research?
- How do you balance reading with experimental work?
- Specificity of resources
- Demonstrated application
- Vague statements like “I read a lot”
- List sources (journals, alerts, webinars)
- Explain sharing mechanism (lab meetings)
- Provide concrete outcome
During a community outreach event I was asked to explain why plastic recycling is challenging.
Translate polymer degradation concepts into layperson terms.
I used analogies comparing polymer chains to spaghetti strands that can be cut but not easily re‑joined. I illustrated the difference between thermoplastic and thermoset plastics with simple visuals and highlighted the role of additives that hinder recycling. I kept the talk under ten minutes and encouraged questions.
Attendees reported a clear understanding, and the local school incorporated the presentation into its science curriculum.
- How do you gauge audience understanding in real time?
- What adjustments would you make for a more technical audience?
- Clarity of explanation
- Use of relatable analogies
- Audience engagement
- Over‑technical jargon
- Set the context
- Use analogies/visuals
- Simplify technical terms
- Engage audience
Our analytical chemistry lab lacked a standardized SOP for calibrating HPLC systems, leading to inconsistent results.
Develop a robust, reproducible SOP and train staff.
I benchmarked industry best practices, drafted a step‑by‑step protocol including system suitability tests, calibration frequency, and documentation templates. I piloted the SOP with three analysts, collected feedback, and refined the document. Finally, I conducted a training workshop and instituted a quarterly audit schedule.
Calibration variance dropped from 12 % to 2 %, and the lab achieved ISO 17025 compliance during the next external audit.
- How do you handle resistance to new procedures?
- What metrics do you use to assess SOP effectiveness?
- Structured approach
- Quantifiable improvement
- Stakeholder involvement
- Skipping validation steps
- Identify SOP gap
- Research best practices
- Draft and pilot SOP
- Train staff and implement audits
- analytical chemistry
- spectroscopy
- HPLC
- GC-MS
- safety protocols
- SDS
- risk assessment
- laboratory techniques
- quality control
- research and development