INTERVIEW

Ace Your Chemistry Interview

Master technical, safety, and behavioral questions with expert answers and proven strategies.

12 Questions
90 min Prep Time
5 Categories
STAR Method
What You'll Learn
To equip aspiring and experienced chemists with targeted interview questions, model answers, and actionable insights that align with industry expectations and ATS requirements.
  • Comprehensive technical and behavioral question bank
  • STAR‑based model answers for each question
  • Competency weighting to focus study effort
  • Tips to avoid common interview pitfalls
  • Downloadable practice PDF for timed mock sessions
Difficulty Mix
Easy: 0.4%
Medium: 0.4%
Hard: 0.2%
Prep Overview
Estimated Prep Time: 90 minutes
Formats: multiple-choice, behavioral, technical
Competency Map
Analytical Thinking: 20%
Laboratory Techniques: 20%
Safety & Compliance: 15%
Problem Solving: 15%
Communication: 15%
Team Collaboration: 15%

Technical Knowledge

Explain the principle of chromatography and a situation where you would choose gas chromatography over liquid chromatography.
Situation

In my undergraduate research I needed to separate volatile organic compounds from a complex mixture.

Task

Select an appropriate separation technique that provides high resolution for volatile analytes.

Action

I chose gas chromatography because the compounds had low boiling points and were thermally stable, allowing rapid separation on a non‑polar column with a temperature program.

Result

The GC run resolved all target peaks within 5 minutes, enabling accurate quantification and saving instrument time compared to HPLC.

Follow‑up Questions
  • What detector would you pair with GC for trace analysis?
  • How do you handle non‑volatile compounds?
Evaluation Criteria
  • Clarity of principle explanation
  • Appropriate justification for technique choice
  • Relevance of example
Red Flags to Avoid
  • Confusing GC with LC fundamentals
  • Choosing GC for thermally labile compounds
Answer Outline
  • Describe chromatography basics
  • Differentiate GC vs LC based on volatility and thermal stability
  • Provide a concrete example
Tip
Mention detector type (e.g., FID or MS) to show depth of knowledge.
What is the Henderson‑Hasselbalch equation and how is it used to prepare buffer solutions?
Situation

During a formulation project I needed a buffer at pH 7.4 for a protein assay.

Task

Calculate the ratio of conjugate base to acid to achieve the target pH.

Action

I applied the Henderson‑Hasselbalch equation, pH = pKa + log([A⁻]/[HA]), using the pKa of phosphate (7.2) to determine a 1.58:1 ratio, then mixed the appropriate amounts of Na₂HPO₄ and NaH₂PO₄.

Result

The resulting buffer maintained pH 7.4 ±0.05 over 24 hours, ensuring assay reproducibility.

Follow‑up Questions
  • How would you adjust the buffer if temperature changes?
  • What limitations does the equation have?
Evaluation Criteria
  • Correct equation usage
  • Accurate calculation demonstration
  • Practical preparation steps
Red Flags to Avoid
  • Incorrect pKa value
  • Ignoring temperature effect
Answer Outline
  • State equation
  • Identify pKa of chosen acid‑base pair
  • Show calculation of ratio
  • Describe preparation steps
Tip
Highlight that the equation assumes ideal behavior and works best within ±1 pH unit of pKa.
Describe how you would determine the purity of a synthesized compound using NMR spectroscopy.
Situation

After synthesizing a new ester in the organic lab, I needed to confirm its purity before scale‑up.

Task

Use ¹H NMR to assess impurity levels and verify structural integrity.

Action

I recorded a high‑resolution ¹H NMR spectrum, integrated peaks corresponding to the ester’s methylene and methyl groups, and compared them to the expected pattern. Any extraneous peaks were quantified by integration relative to an internal standard.

Result

The spectrum showed >98 % purity with only trace solvent peaks, allowing me to proceed to the next reaction step confidently.

Follow‑up Questions
  • What additional NMR experiments could you run for structural confirmation?
  • How would you handle overlapping peaks?
Evaluation Criteria
  • Understanding of NMR basics
  • Correct use of integration for purity
  • Recognition of solvent/residual peaks
Red Flags to Avoid
  • Misinterpreting peak multiplicity
  • Failing to mention internal standard
Answer Outline
  • Explain sample preparation
  • Identify key peaks for target compound
  • Use integration to quantify impurities
  • Conclude on purity level
Tip
Mention using a deuterated solvent and referencing TMS or residual solvent peak for chemical shift calibration.
How do you calculate the degree of polymerization (DP) from the number‑average molecular weight (Mn) of a polymer?
Situation

In a polymer chemistry internship I was tasked with reporting the DP of a poly(ethylene terephthalate) batch.

Task

Convert the measured Mn to DP using the monomer repeat unit weight.

Action

I divided the Mn (45,000 g mol⁻¹) by the molecular weight of the repeat unit (192 g mol⁻¹), yielding a DP of ~235.

Result

The calculated DP matched the target specification, confirming successful polymerization and enabling downstream processing decisions.

Follow‑up Questions
  • What factors could cause Mn to differ from the theoretical value?
  • How would you determine polydispersity index (PDI)?
Evaluation Criteria
  • Accurate formula usage
  • Clear numerical example
  • Awareness of practical considerations
Red Flags to Avoid
  • Using weight‑average instead of number‑average
  • Neglecting end‑group contribution for low DP
Answer Outline
  • Define DP and Mn relationship
  • Provide formula DP = Mn / M₀
  • Insert example numbers
  • Interpret result
Tip
Note that for low‑DP polymers, end‑group mass can significantly affect Mn calculations.

Safety & Compliance

What are the key components of a Chemical Hygiene Plan (CHP) and why are they important?
Situation

At my previous university lab I was involved in updating the CHP after a new reagent was introduced.

Task

Identify and document essential CHP elements to ensure regulatory compliance and worker safety.

Action

I ensured the plan included a chemical inventory, standard operating procedures, exposure limits, personal protective equipment requirements, waste disposal protocols, and emergency response procedures.

Result

The revised CHP passed the institutional safety audit with no citations, and lab members reported increased confidence in handling hazardous chemicals.

Follow‑up Questions
  • How do you keep the chemical inventory up to date?
  • What steps would you take after a spill of a corrosive acid?
Evaluation Criteria
  • Comprehensiveness of components
  • Link to regulatory standards
  • Practical examples
Red Flags to Avoid
  • Omitting emergency response
Answer Outline
  • List inventory, SOPs, exposure limits, PPE, waste, emergency response
  • Explain regulatory basis (OSHA, EPA)
Tip
Emphasize the role of regular training and review cycles.
Explain the hierarchy of controls and give an example of how you applied it to reduce laboratory exposure to volatile solvents.
Situation

Our organic synthesis lab experienced frequent fume hood alarms due to solvent vapors.

Task

Implement controls to minimize inhalation exposure.

Action

I applied the hierarchy: first, substituted a high‑volatility solvent with a less volatile alternative (engineering control). When substitution wasn’t feasible, I upgraded the fume hood airflow and introduced local exhaust ventilation (engineering). I also reinforced PPE usage and provided training (administrative and PPE).

Result

Airborne solvent concentrations dropped by 70 %, and the lab passed the annual industrial hygiene inspection without violations.

Follow‑up Questions
  • What monitoring methods would you use to verify control effectiveness?
  • If substitution isn’t possible, what’s the next best control?
Evaluation Criteria
  • Correct hierarchy order
  • Concrete example
  • Quantified outcome
Red Flags to Avoid
  • Skipping elimination/substitution steps
Answer Outline
  • Define hierarchy (elimination, substitution, engineering, administrative, PPE)
  • Describe specific actions taken
Tip
Mention periodic verification of fume hood face velocity.
What steps would you take to safely dispose of a waste stream containing both organic solvents and heavy metal salts?
Situation

During a project I generated a mixed waste stream of dichloromethane and copper sulfate residues.

Task

Develop a disposal protocol that meets hazardous waste regulations.

Action

I first segregated the waste by phase separation, extracting the organic layer for collection as hazardous organic waste. The aqueous phase containing copper was neutralized, precipitated, and filtered. The solid copper salt was then sent to a licensed metal recycling facility, while the aqueous filtrate was treated to meet discharge limits before disposal.

Result

All waste was disposed of in compliance with EPA RCRA guidelines, and the audit report showed zero non‑compliance findings.

Follow‑up Questions
  • How would you handle a mixed waste that cannot be easily separated?
  • What documentation is required for hazardous waste shipments?
Evaluation Criteria
  • Understanding of segregation
  • Regulatory compliance awareness
  • Clear procedural steps
Red Flags to Avoid
  • Suggesting disposal in regular trash
Answer Outline
  • Phase separation
  • Separate organic and aqueous streams
  • Treat each according to regulations
Tip
Reference the need for a waste manifest and proper labeling.
Describe the procedure for conducting a risk assessment before starting a new experimental protocol involving toxic reagents.
Situation

Before initiating a novel organophosphorus synthesis, my supervisor required a formal risk assessment.

Task

Identify hazards, evaluate risks, and propose mitigation measures.

Action

I listed each reagent’s toxicity, consulted SDSs, evaluated exposure routes, and used a risk matrix to score severity and likelihood. Controls included using a certified fume hood, wearing double gloves, implementing spill kits, and scheduling a safety briefing. I documented the assessment in the lab’s risk register.

Result

The experiment proceeded without incident, and the risk assessment was cited as a model during the department’s safety review.

Follow‑up Questions
  • What factors influence the likelihood rating in a risk matrix?
  • How often should the risk assessment be reviewed?
Evaluation Criteria
  • Systematic approach
  • Use of standard tools (SDS, matrix)
  • Specific controls
Red Flags to Avoid
  • Skipping documentation
Answer Outline
  • Identify reagents and hazards
  • Consult SDS
  • Use risk matrix
  • Define controls
  • Document
Tip
Mention involving a safety officer for high‑risk protocols.

Behavioral & Problem Solving

Tell me about a time you had to troubleshoot a failed reaction. What was your approach and the outcome?
Situation

In my graduate research a Suzuki coupling yielded only starting material after 24 hours.

Task

Identify the cause of failure and recover the project timeline.

Action

I reviewed the reaction parameters, confirmed the palladium catalyst freshness, checked the base’s moisture content, and ran a small-scale test varying the solvent polarity. I discovered that residual water in the base quenched the catalyst. Replacing the base with a freshly dried version and adding molecular sieves restored activity.

Result

The optimized reaction gave 85 % isolated yield, allowing me to meet the conference abstract deadline.

Follow‑up Questions
  • How do you prioritize which variable to test first?
  • What documentation do you keep during troubleshooting?
Evaluation Criteria
  • Logical troubleshooting flow
  • Technical accuracy
  • Result orientation
Red Flags to Avoid
  • Blaming equipment without analysis
Answer Outline
  • State the failed reaction
  • Systematic troubleshooting steps
  • Identify root cause
  • Implement solution and result
Tip
Emphasize data‑driven decision making.
How do you stay current with advancements in chemical research and industry trends?
Situation

As a post‑doc I needed to ensure my project aligned with emerging green chemistry practices.

Task

Develop a routine for continuous learning and knowledge sharing.

Action

I subscribed to key journals (JACS, Green Chemistry), set up RSS alerts for relevant keywords, attended monthly webinars, and presented summaries at our lab meetings. I also participated in a professional society’s special interest group on sustainable synthesis.

Result

My incorporation of a solvent‑free protocol reduced waste by 40 % and was later highlighted in the department’s annual report.

Follow‑up Questions
  • What criteria do you use to evaluate the relevance of new research?
  • How do you balance reading with experimental work?
Evaluation Criteria
  • Specificity of resources
  • Demonstrated application
Red Flags to Avoid
  • Vague statements like “I read a lot”
Answer Outline
  • List sources (journals, alerts, webinars)
  • Explain sharing mechanism (lab meetings)
  • Provide concrete outcome
Tip
Mention a recent paper and how it influenced your work.
Describe a situation where you had to explain a complex chemical concept to a non‑technical audience.
Situation

During a community outreach event I was asked to explain why plastic recycling is challenging.

Task

Translate polymer degradation concepts into layperson terms.

Action

I used analogies comparing polymer chains to spaghetti strands that can be cut but not easily re‑joined. I illustrated the difference between thermoplastic and thermoset plastics with simple visuals and highlighted the role of additives that hinder recycling. I kept the talk under ten minutes and encouraged questions.

Result

Attendees reported a clear understanding, and the local school incorporated the presentation into its science curriculum.

Follow‑up Questions
  • How do you gauge audience understanding in real time?
  • What adjustments would you make for a more technical audience?
Evaluation Criteria
  • Clarity of explanation
  • Use of relatable analogies
  • Audience engagement
Red Flags to Avoid
  • Over‑technical jargon
Answer Outline
  • Set the context
  • Use analogies/visuals
  • Simplify technical terms
  • Engage audience
Tip
Mention checking for misconceptions through quick polls.
Give an example of how you contributed to improving a laboratory’s standard operating procedures (SOPs).
Situation

Our analytical chemistry lab lacked a standardized SOP for calibrating HPLC systems, leading to inconsistent results.

Task

Develop a robust, reproducible SOP and train staff.

Action

I benchmarked industry best practices, drafted a step‑by‑step protocol including system suitability tests, calibration frequency, and documentation templates. I piloted the SOP with three analysts, collected feedback, and refined the document. Finally, I conducted a training workshop and instituted a quarterly audit schedule.

Result

Calibration variance dropped from 12 % to 2 %, and the lab achieved ISO 17025 compliance during the next external audit.

Follow‑up Questions
  • How do you handle resistance to new procedures?
  • What metrics do you use to assess SOP effectiveness?
Evaluation Criteria
  • Structured approach
  • Quantifiable improvement
  • Stakeholder involvement
Red Flags to Avoid
  • Skipping validation steps
Answer Outline
  • Identify SOP gap
  • Research best practices
  • Draft and pilot SOP
  • Train staff and implement audits
Tip
Highlight the importance of documentation and continuous improvement.
ATS Tips
  • analytical chemistry
  • spectroscopy
  • HPLC
  • GC-MS
  • safety protocols
  • SDS
  • risk assessment
  • laboratory techniques
  • quality control
  • research and development
Download our Chemist Resume Template
Practice Pack
Timed Rounds: 30 minutes
Mix: technical, behavioral

Boost your interview confidence with our free Chemist practice pack!

Get the Free Pack

More Interview Guides

Check out Resumly's Free AI Tools