Master Your Orthopedic Surgeon Interview
Realistic questions, expert model answers, and actionable tips to showcase your surgical expertise.
- Practice behavioral and technical questions specific to orthopedics
- Learn STAR‑formatted model answers from experienced surgeons
- Identify red flags and how to avoid them
- Get tips for articulating complex surgical cases
- Download a printable practice pack
Clinical Knowledge
While on call, a 55‑year‑old patient presented with progressive hip pain and limited mobility after a fall, with inconclusive X‑rays.
I needed to identify the underlying pathology and decide whether conservative management or surgery was indicated.
Ordered MRI, consulted radiology, identified a displaced femoral neck fracture with acetabular involvement, discussed options with the multidisciplinary team, and explained risks/benefits to the patient.
The patient underwent a total hip arthroplasty, regained full function within six months, and reported a 95% satisfaction score.
- What imaging modalities would you consider if MRI was contraindicated?
- How did you involve the patient in the decision‑making process?
- Clarity of diagnostic reasoning
- Use of evidence‑based imaging
- Team collaboration
- Patient‑centered communication
- Outcome focus
- Vague description of imaging choices
- No mention of patient consent
- Gathered detailed history and performed focused physical exam
- Utilized advanced imaging (MRI) to clarify fracture pattern
- Collaborated with radiology and orthopedic trauma team
- Developed a surgical plan (total hip arthroplasty)
- Communicated plan and postoperative expectations to patient
In a rapidly evolving field, maintaining up‑to‑date knowledge is essential for optimal patient outcomes.
Continuously integrate new evidence and technologies into my practice.
Subscribe to major journals (JBJS, The Bone & Joint Journal), attend annual AAOS meetings, participate in hands‑on workshops for robotic-assisted knee arthroplasty, and lead a monthly journal club for our department.
Implemented robotic navigation for knee replacements, reducing alignment errors by 15% and improving patient satisfaction scores.
- Can you give an example of a technology you adopted and its impact?
- How do you evaluate the quality of new evidence before implementation?
- Demonstrates proactive learning
- Specific examples of continued education
- Impact on patient outcomes
- Leadership in knowledge dissemination
- Generic statements without concrete actions
- Regularly read peer‑reviewed orthopedic journals
- Attend national conferences and hands‑on workshops
- Participate in departmental journal clubs
- Engage in research collaborations
- Apply new techniques after thorough evaluation
Patient Care
A 68‑year‑old patient developed a deep surgical site infection two weeks after a total knee replacement.
Identify the source, control the infection, and preserve joint function while maintaining patient trust.
Ordered labs and cultures, initiated broad‑spectrum IV antibiotics, consulted infectious disease, performed irrigation and debridement, and kept the patient informed daily about progress and next steps.
Infection resolved without need for prosthesis removal; patient discharged with oral antibiotics and achieved 120° knee flexion at three‑month follow‑up.
- What criteria did you use to decide on surgical debridement versus antibiotics alone?
- How did you address the patient’s concerns about future mobility?
- Prompt identification of complication
- Appropriate use of multidisciplinary resources
- Clear communication strategy
- Successful clinical outcome
- Failure to mention multidisciplinary involvement
- Recognized signs of infection early
- Coordinated multidisciplinary response (ID, nursing)
- Performed timely surgical intervention
- Maintained transparent communication with patient and family
- Monitored outcomes and adjusted therapy
A 45‑year‑old active patient with a symptomatic rotator cuff tear expressed fear of surgery and preferred conservative therapy.
Help the patient understand risks, benefits, and realistic outcomes of both options.
Reviewed imaging together, explained natural history of untreated tears, presented success rates and recovery timelines for arthroscopic repair, discussed potential complications, and offered a trial of physical therapy with a clear re‑evaluation point.
Patient chose surgery after two weeks, underwent arthroscopic repair, and returned to full activity within four months, reporting high satisfaction.
- What tools do you use to illustrate surgical outcomes?
- How do you document the shared decision‑making process?
- Clarity of information provided
- Balanced presentation of options
- Patient empowerment
- Documentation of consent
- Pressuring the patient without exploring concerns
- Provide clear, jargon‑free explanation of condition
- Present balanced view of surgical vs. non‑surgical options
- Use visual aids and patient‑specific data
- Set expectations for recovery and possible risks
- Invite questions and respect patient autonomy
Teamwork & Communication
During a complex spinal fusion, the anesthesiologist and I disagreed on the timing of intra‑operative neuromonitoring alerts.
Ensure patient safety while maintaining a collaborative environment.
Paused the case, facilitated a brief discussion to clarify monitoring thresholds, reviewed the protocol together, and agreed on a unified response plan. Afterwards, debriefed the team to reinforce communication standards.
The surgery proceeded without neurologic injury, and the team reported improved mutual trust in subsequent cases.
- How do you prevent similar conflicts in future cases?
- What role does the surgical safety checklist play in your approach?
- Timely conflict identification
- Effective communication and negotiation
- Adherence to safety protocols
- Positive outcome
- Escalating tension without resolution
- Identify the source of disagreement promptly
- Create a safe space for open dialogue
- Reference established protocols
- Agree on a joint action plan
- Conduct post‑case debrief
A PGY‑2 resident was assigned to manage a distal radius fracture with associated median nerve compression.
Guide the resident to develop a comprehensive treatment plan and perform the surgery safely.
Reviewed the case together, demonstrated the surgical approach, supervised the reduction and fixation, provided real‑time feedback, and discussed postoperative care and nerve monitoring.
The resident successfully completed the procedure, the patient recovered full nerve function, and the resident expressed increased confidence for future cases.
- What feedback method do you find most effective for surgical trainees?
- How do you assess when a resident is ready for independent cases?
- Clarity of mentorship process
- Resident’s skill development
- Patient outcome
- Reflective teaching
- Lack of specific teaching actions
- Pre‑operative case review with resident
- Demonstrate key surgical steps
- Supervise and give constructive feedback
- Discuss postoperative management
- Reflect on learning points
- total joint arthroplasty
- fracture fixation
- minimally invasive surgery
- patient safety
- multidisciplinary team
- evidence‑based practice