INTERVIEW

Master Your Occupational Therapist Interview

Realistic questions, STAR model answers, and actionable tips to help you shine

6 Questions
90 min Prep Time
5 Categories
STAR Method
What You'll Learn
To equip occupational therapist candidates with targeted interview questions, model answers, and preparation tools that align with industry expectations and improve interview performance.
  • Understand key competencies interviewers assess
  • Learn STAR‑structured model answers for common scenarios
  • Identify red flags and how to avoid them
  • Get actionable tips to refine your responses
  • Practice with timed mock interview rounds
Difficulty Mix
Easy: 40%
Medium: 40%
Hard: 20%
Prep Overview
Estimated Prep Time: 90 minutes
Formats: behavioral, situational, technical
Competency Map
Patient Assessment: 20%
Therapeutic Intervention Planning: 20%
Communication & Education: 20%
Team Collaboration: 20%
Documentation & Compliance: 20%

Patient Assessment

Describe a time when you had to assess a patient with complex neurological deficits.
Situation

I was assigned a 58‑year‑old stroke survivor with hemiplegia, aphasia, and severe spasticity who was being considered for discharge to home care.

Task

My task was to conduct a comprehensive functional assessment to determine safe discharge level and identify therapy goals.

Action

I used the Fugl‑Meyer Assessment for motor function, the Modified Ashworth Scale for spasticity, and the Functional Independence Measure to gauge ADL abilities. I collaborated with the speech therapist to evaluate communication barriers and consulted the physician for medical stability. I documented findings in a detailed report and presented them at the interdisciplinary team meeting.

Result

The team approved a tailored home‑based OT program focusing on upper‑limb functional training and caregiver education, which reduced the patient’s readmission risk and improved independence scores by 15% over six weeks.

Follow‑up Questions
  • What specific assessment tools did you prioritize?
  • How did you address the patient’s communication challenges?
  • What was the biggest obstacle during the assessment?
Evaluation Criteria
  • Use of evidence‑based assessment tools
  • Clear articulation of interdisciplinary collaboration
  • Focus on patient‑centered outcomes
  • Quantifiable results
Red Flags to Avoid
  • Vague description of assessment process
  • No mention of outcome metrics
Answer Outline
  • Conducted standardized neurological assessments
  • Collaborated with speech therapist and physician
  • Documented findings and presented to team
  • Developed targeted home‑based intervention plan
  • Achieved measurable improvement in ADL independence
Tip
Highlight specific standardized tools and tie assessment findings directly to the intervention plan and measurable results.
How do you prioritize goals for a pediatric client with multiple functional limitations?
Situation

I worked with a 4‑year‑old diagnosed with cerebral palsy who had limited hand function, poor trunk control, and delayed self‑care skills.

Task

I needed to establish a hierarchy of therapy goals that would maximize functional independence and align with the family’s daily routines.

Action

I first conducted a goal‑setting interview with the parents to understand their priorities, then performed a Pediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory (PEDI) to identify current performance levels. I ranked goals using the SMART framework, focusing first on trunk stability to enable seated play, followed by hand‑function tasks for feeding, and finally fine‑motor activities for dressing. I incorporated parent‑mediated activities into the home program and scheduled weekly progress reviews.

Result

Within three months, the child achieved independent sitting for 30 minutes, could self‑feed using adaptive utensils, and parents reported a 40% reduction in assistance needed for dressing.

Follow‑up Questions
  • Why did you choose trunk stability as the first goal?
  • How did you involve the family in the goal‑setting process?
Evaluation Criteria
  • Family‑centered approach
  • Use of standardized pediatric assessment
  • Clear prioritization logic
  • Demonstrated outcome tracking
Red Flags to Avoid
  • Skipping family input
  • Listing goals without measurable criteria
Answer Outline
  • Interviewed parents to identify priorities
  • Performed PEDI assessment
  • Applied SMART criteria to rank goals
  • Focused first on trunk stability, then hand function, then fine motor
  • Integrated parent‑mediated home activities
  • Tracked progress with weekly reviews
Tip
Emphasize collaboration with caregivers and the logical progression of goals based on functional hierarchy.

Team Collaboration

Give an example of how you resolved a disagreement with a physical therapist about a patient’s treatment plan.
Situation

During a post‑operative knee replacement case, the PT advocated for early aggressive gait training, while I was concerned about the patient’s limited shoulder mobility affecting wheelchair transfers.

Task

My goal was to reach a consensus that ensured safe progression without compromising either therapist’s objectives.

Action

I scheduled a brief interdisciplinary huddle, presented objective data from the patient’s shoulder range‑of‑motion measurements, and highlighted the PT’s gait milestones. I suggested a phased approach: start with modified gait training using a walker while I implemented shoulder strengthening and transfer training. We agreed to reassess shoulder function after two weeks before intensifying gait work.

Result

The patient achieved safe independent transfers by week three and progressed to full weight‑bearing gait by week six without any falls or shoulder setbacks, satisfying both therapy goals.

Follow‑up Questions
  • What data convinced the PT to adjust the plan?
  • How did you ensure ongoing communication?
Evaluation Criteria
  • Evidence‑based negotiation
  • Clear communication of data
  • Collaborative solution
  • Positive patient outcome
Red Flags to Avoid
  • Blaming the other therapist
  • Lack of specific data
Answer Outline
  • Collected objective data on shoulder mobility
  • Facilitated a focused interdisciplinary meeting
  • Proposed a phased, data‑driven compromise
  • Established clear reassessment timeline
Tip
Showcase data‑driven negotiation and a win‑win solution that prioritizes patient safety.
How do you educate patients and families about home exercise programs to ensure adherence?
Situation

A 72‑year‑old post‑stroke client and his spouse were overwhelmed by the prescribed home exercise regimen.

Task

I needed to simplify the program and boost confidence to improve adherence.

Action

I broke the program into three short sessions, created illustrated handouts with step‑by‑step photos, and demonstrated each exercise using a mirror for visual feedback. I taught the spouse a cueing technique and set up a weekly phone check‑in. I also linked exercises to meaningful daily activities, like reaching for a cup, to increase relevance.

Result

Adherence rose to 90% over the next four weeks, and the client’s UE functional scores improved by 20%, with the spouse reporting increased confidence in supporting the therapy.

Follow‑up Questions
  • What tools did you use to make instructions clear?
  • How did you measure adherence?
Evaluation Criteria
  • Clarity of instruction
  • Use of visual aids
  • Caregiver involvement
  • measurable adherence data
Red Flags to Avoid
  • Assuming patient will follow without support
Answer Outline
  • Simplified exercise schedule
  • Developed visual handouts
  • Demonstrated with mirror feedback
  • Trained caregiver on cueing
  • Scheduled regular follow‑ups
  • Connected exercises to daily tasks
Tip
Combine visual aids, caregiver training, and regular check‑ins to reinforce adherence.

Documentation & Compliance

Explain how you ensure your documentation meets regulatory standards and supports insurance billing.
Situation

In my previous outpatient clinic, we faced audits due to inconsistent OT notes that delayed insurance reimbursements.

Task

I was tasked with standardizing documentation to meet Medicare and state regulations while maintaining clinical relevance.

Action

I reviewed the latest CMS guidelines, created a template aligning with the SOAP format, and incorporated required elements such as diagnosis code, functional goals, objective measures, and justification for each intervention. I conducted a training session for the OT team, instituted a peer‑review checklist, and set up monthly audits to catch deviations early.

Result

Documentation compliance improved to 98% within two months, audit findings dropped to zero, and claim denial rates decreased by 35%, accelerating reimbursement cycles.

Follow‑up Questions
  • How did you stay updated on changing regulations?
  • What metrics did you track to gauge improvement?
Evaluation Criteria
  • Knowledge of regulatory requirements
  • Creation of practical documentation tools
  • Team training and monitoring
  • Quantifiable improvement in audit outcomes
Red Flags to Avoid
  • General statements without specific actions
Answer Outline
  • Reviewed CMS and state guidelines
  • Developed standardized SOAP template
  • Included required codes and objective measures
  • Trained staff on new template
  • Implemented peer‑review and monthly audits
Tip
Demonstrate a systematic approach: guidelines review, template creation, training, and ongoing quality checks.
Describe a situation where you had to adapt your intervention due to limited resources or equipment.
Situation

At a community health center, we lacked specialized adaptive equipment for a client with severe hand weakness post‑trauma.

Task

I needed to deliver effective hand therapy using only the limited supplies available.

Action

I improvised by using everyday items: rubber bands for resistance, kitchen tongs for grasp training, and textured fabrics for sensory stimulation. I also collaborated with a local nonprofit to obtain donated therapy putty. I documented each improvised activity with clear objectives and outcomes to satisfy documentation standards.

Result

The client achieved a 30% increase in grip strength over eight weeks and reported greater confidence in performing daily tasks, despite the equipment constraints.

Follow‑up Questions
  • What criteria did you use to select alternative items?
  • How did you ensure safety with improvised tools?
Evaluation Criteria
  • Creativity and safety of adaptations
  • Alignment with therapeutic goals
  • Documentation of alternatives
  • Measured patient improvement
Red Flags to Avoid
  • Ignoring safety considerations
Answer Outline
  • Identified equipment gaps
  • Selected household items as substitutes
  • Sourced donated materials
  • Documented improvised interventions
  • Monitored progress with objective measures
Tip
Show resourcefulness while maintaining safety and clear documentation of adaptations.
ATS Tips
  • occupational therapy
  • patient assessment
  • rehabilitation
  • interdisciplinary team
  • treatment planning
  • documentation compliance
Download our OT resume template to showcase your skills
Practice Pack
Timed Rounds: 30 minutes
Mix: easy, medium, hard

Ready to ace your OT interview? Get our free prep guide now!

Get the Guide

More Interview Guides

Check out Resumly's Free AI Tools