Ace Your Rehabilitation Specialist Interview
Master the most common questions, showcase your expertise, and stand out to employers
- Understand key competencies employers seek
- Learn structured STAR responses for each question
- Identify red flags to avoid during interviews
- Access a timed practice pack for realistic rehearsal
Patient Assessment
I received a 68‑year‑old patient with COPD, diabetes, and recent hip replacement who was referred for outpatient rehab.
My task was to complete a comprehensive functional and medical assessment to determine safe exercise parameters and set realistic goals.
I reviewed the medical records, conducted a detailed interview focusing on pain, mobility, and daily activities, performed gait and strength tests, and used the Barthel Index to quantify independence. I consulted the orthopedic surgeon for weight‑bearing restrictions and coordinated with the diabetes educator for glucose monitoring during therapy.
I identified that the patient could safely begin low‑impact aquatic therapy, set a goal to improve walking distance by 20% in six weeks, and documented a personalized plan that was approved by the care team, leading to a measurable functional gain and reduced readmission risk.
- What assessment tools did you prioritize?
- How did you involve the patient in goal setting?
- Clarity of assessment process
- Use of evidence‑based tools
- Patient‑centered goal formulation
- Vague description of assessment
- No mention of interdisciplinary input
- Review medical records and consult specialists
- Interview patient to understand functional limitations
- Perform standardized functional tests
- Document findings and create a tailored plan
- Communicate plan to interdisciplinary team
A 55‑year‑old post‑stroke patient presented with right‑side weakness and limited self‑care ability.
I needed to prioritize functional goals that would maximize independence and align with the patient’s discharge timeline.
I conducted a Fugl‑Meyer assessment to quantify motor recovery, discussed personal priorities (returning to work and cooking), and used the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure to rank goals. I then sequenced goals from foundational (sitting balance) to higher‑order tasks (meal preparation), ensuring each built on the previous achievement.
The patient achieved independent transfers within three weeks, regained sufficient upper‑limb function to feed themselves by week five, and was discharged home with a clear home‑exercise program, meeting both clinical and personal objectives.
- Which assessment scales do you find most reliable?
- How do you adjust goals if progress stalls?
- Evidence‑based assessment usage
- Patient‑centered goal alignment
- Logical sequencing of goals
- Ignoring patient preferences
- Skipping standardized assessments
- Perform standardized motor and functional assessments
- Elicit patient’s personal priorities
- Rank goals using COPM or similar tool
- Sequence goals from basic to complex
- Monitor progress and adjust as needed
Interdisciplinary Collaboration
During a 4‑week inpatient rehab stay for a traumatic brain injury patient, the medical team identified fluctuating cognition that impacted therapy progression.
I was responsible for aligning the physical therapy plan with the physician’s medical orders and the occupational therapist’s cognitive interventions.
I organized a daily interdisciplinary huddle, shared objective progress notes, and created a shared treatment calendar. I clarified the physician’s medication adjustments, incorporated OT’s cognitive drills into PT sessions, and documented all modifications in the EMR for transparency.
The coordinated approach reduced therapy delays by 30%, improved the patient’s MoCA score by 4 points, and facilitated a smoother transition to outpatient services with a unified discharge plan.
- How did you handle conflicting recommendations?
- What communication tools did you use?
- Frequency of team communication
- Clarity of shared documentation
- Demonstrated outcome improvements
- No evidence of regular meetings
- Blaming other disciplines
- Initiate regular interdisciplinary meetings
- Share concise progress updates
- Align treatment plans with medical orders
- Document coordination in EMR
- Track outcomes collaboratively
A patient with spinal cord injury was slated for early discharge by the physician, but the PT and OT felt additional functional training was needed.
My role was to mediate the disagreement and ensure the discharge plan met safety standards and compliance requirements.
I facilitated a structured case conference, presented objective outcome data (strength scores, ADL independence levels), referenced the facility’s discharge criteria, and invited each discipline to voice concerns. I documented the discussion, highlighted evidence‑based recommendations, and proposed a conditional discharge with a home‑health follow‑up schedule.
The team reached consensus on a delayed discharge by one week, allowing the patient to achieve safe wheelchair transfers, which reduced readmission risk and complied with accreditation standards.
- What steps do you take if consensus cannot be reached?
- How do you ensure compliance documentation is complete?
- Use of objective data
- Adherence to policy
- Effective conflict resolution
- Avoiding documentation
- Personalizing the conflict
- Gather objective outcome data
- Review facility discharge criteria
- Hold a structured case conference
- Document consensus and conditional plans
- Implement follow‑up services
Documentation & Compliance
In my outpatient clinic, I handle daily documentation for up to 15 patients, each with sensitive health information.
I needed to ensure records were complete, accurate, and protected per HIPAA regulations.
I use a standardized electronic health record template that prompts for assessment, treatment, and progress notes. I double‑check entries for accuracy before signing, encrypt all data transfers, and store any paper consents in locked cabinets. I also conduct quarterly audits to verify compliance and provide brief privacy reminders to the team.
My meticulous approach has resulted in zero audit findings over the past two years and consistently high patient satisfaction scores regarding privacy.
- How do you handle a documentation error discovered after submission?
- What backup systems do you rely on?
- Completeness of records
- Adherence to HIPAA
- Proactive audit practices
- Vague description of security measures
- Use standardized EHR templates
- Verify entries before signing
- Encrypt data and secure physical documents
- Perform regular compliance audits
- Educate team on privacy policies
During a quarterly chart review, I noticed that several therapy notes lacked the required therapist signature timestamps, violating state regulations.
I had to correct the existing records and prevent recurrence.
I immediately flagged the affected charts, contacted the therapists to obtain retroactive electronic signatures with documented justification, and updated the notes. I then revised the clinic’s documentation SOP to include an automatic timestamp reminder, conducted a brief training session, and instituted a weekly checklist for supervisors to verify compliance.
All non‑compliant notes were corrected within 48 hours, the clinic passed the subsequent audit with no findings, and the new SOP reduced similar errors by 90%.
- What systems do you use to track documentation compliance?
- How do you ensure staff buy‑in for new procedures?
- Speed of correction
- Effectiveness of process improvement
- Documentation of corrective actions
- No concrete corrective steps
- Identify non‑compliant entries
- Correct records promptly
- Update SOP with automated reminders
- Train staff on new process
- Implement supervisory checklist
Communication & Patient Education
A 45‑year‑old post‑knee arthroplasty patient was being discharged home with limited support.
I needed to ensure the patient and his spouse could safely continue the prescribed exercise regimen independently.
I demonstrated each exercise, provided a printed illustrated handout, recorded a short video tutorial, and used teach‑back technique to confirm understanding. I also set up a follow‑up telehealth check‑in for the first two weeks and gave the spouse a checklist for monitoring pain and swelling.
The patient adhered to the program, achieved full range of motion by week six, and reported high confidence in managing his recovery, leading to a successful discharge without complications.
- What strategies do you use for patients with low health literacy?
- How do you track adherence after discharge?
- Clarity of instructions
- Use of multimodal teaching tools
- Verification of understanding
- Assuming patient knows how without confirmation
- Demonstrate exercises in person
- Provide printed and video resources
- Use teach‑back to confirm comprehension
- Schedule follow‑up telehealth
- Give monitoring checklist to family
I was treating an 80‑year‑old patient with early‑stage Alzheimer’s who struggled to follow multi‑step instructions.
My goal was to teach a simple balance exercise while ensuring safety and comprehension.
I broke the instruction into one‑step cues, used visual gestures, repeated key points, and allowed extra processing time. I also paired the exercise with a familiar daily activity (standing while brushing teeth) to create context. I checked understanding by asking the patient to demonstrate each step before proceeding.
The patient successfully performed the balance exercise with minimal assistance, reported feeling more confident, and the therapist noted a measurable improvement in static balance over four weeks.
- How do you document adaptations for future providers?
- What techniques work for severe impairments?
- Adaptation of language and pacing
- Use of visual aids
- Verification of patient comprehension
- One‑size‑fits‑all communication
- Simplify instructions to single steps
- Use visual and gestural cues
- Allow extra processing time
- Link activity to familiar routine
- Confirm understanding through demonstration
- rehabilitation
- patient assessment
- treatment planning
- interdisciplinary team
- evidence‑based practice
- documentation compliance