Master Your Archivist Interview
Practice proven questions, refine your answers, and land the archival position you deserve.
- Explore behavioral, technical, and situational questions specific to archival work
- Review STAR‑formatted model answers crafted by senior archivists
- Identify key competencies and red‑flag indicators
- Access a timed practice pack for realistic interview simulation
Behavioral
At my previous institution, the collections department resisted a new accession policy that required detailed provenance documentation.
I needed to demonstrate the long‑term benefits of the policy for both legal compliance and collection integrity.
I prepared a concise presentation with case studies, organized a workshop, and provided a draft policy template for feedback.
Stakeholders approved the policy within two weeks, leading to a 30% reduction in missing provenance records over the next year.
- What metrics did you use to track compliance?
- How did you handle dissenting opinions during the workshop?
- Clarity of situation
- Demonstrated influence and communication skills
- Evidence of measurable results
- Vague impact, no data
- Explain context and resistance
- State objective to gain buy‑in
- Detail communication and collaborative steps
- Quantify outcome
Our regional archive’s oral history collection was stored in analog tapes with limited catalog information.
Increase discoverability and ease of use for academic researchers.
I digitized the tapes, created detailed metadata using Dublin Core, and integrated the collection into the institution’s online portal with a searchable interface.
Research requests rose by 45% within six months, and the collection was cited in three peer‑reviewed articles.
- What challenges did you face during digitization?
- How did you ensure metadata consistency?
- Problem identification
- Technical execution
- Impact on research community
- No quantifiable outcome
- Describe the original access barriers
- Define the goal of improved accessibility
- Outline digitization and metadata workflow
- Provide usage statistics post‑implementation
Two archivists disagreed on the priority of conserving a deteriorating manuscript versus processing new acquisitions.
Resolve the conflict and establish a balanced workflow.
I facilitated a meeting, presented condition reports, and introduced a triage matrix that weighted urgency, research demand, and preservation risk.
The team adopted the matrix, resulting in a 20% faster turnaround for high‑risk items while maintaining acquisition targets.
- How did you ensure the matrix remained flexible?
- What feedback did team members provide afterward?
- Conflict resolution approach
- Use of data‑driven tools
- Positive change in productivity
- Blaming language
- Set the scene of disagreement
- State the need for resolution
- Describe the collaborative tool introduced
- Show the improved workflow outcome
A new federal privacy law required immediate redaction of personally identifiable information in digital archives.
Implement compliance across all existing digital collections within 30 days.
I assembled a cross‑functional task force, deployed automated redaction software, and conducted staff training on the new protocol.
All collections were compliant ahead of the deadline, avoiding potential fines and preserving public trust.
- What criteria did you use to prioritize collections?
- How did you verify the accuracy of automated redactions?
- Urgency handling
- Leadership and coordination
- Compliance verification
- Lack of specific actions
- Explain regulatory change
- Define urgent compliance goal
- Detail rapid response actions
- Highlight successful, timely outcome
Technical
While cataloguing a photographic collection, the institution required adherence to both IPTC and VRA Core standards.
Create metadata records that satisfied both standards without duplicate effort.
I designed a crosswalk table mapping IPTC fields to VRA elements, built a template in our cataloging system, and trained staff on its use.
Metadata entry time decreased by 25%, and the collection met both internal and external discovery requirements.
- Why choose those standards for that collection?
- How do you handle updates to standards?
- Knowledge of standards
- Problem‑solving in mapping
- Training effectiveness
- Generic answer without specifics
- Identify standards used
- Explain crosswalk creation
- Describe implementation and training
- Quantify efficiency gains
A 19th‑century diary showed signs of foxing and brittle paper during a routine collection review.
Conduct a thorough condition assessment to determine conservation needs.
I performed a visual inspection under magnification, recorded findings using a standardized condition report form, measured humidity and pH levels, and photographed damage for documentation.
The report informed a grant application that secured funding for professional conservation, extending the diary’s lifespan by an estimated 50 years.
- What tools do you use for pH testing?
- How do you prioritize items for treatment?
- Methodical approach
- Use of appropriate tools
- Link to preservation outcomes
- Skipping documentation
- Describe initial observation
- Outline systematic assessment steps
- Document findings
- Link assessment to conservation action
Our institution received a large batch of email archives and website snapshots from a defunct agency.
Create a sustainable preservation workflow that maintains authenticity and accessibility.
I implemented an OAIS‑based workflow: performed format validation, generated fixity checks, stored files in a secure, redundant repository, and documented provenance metadata using PREMIS.
The digital collection remains accessible after five years, with regular integrity checks showing 0% bit‑rot, and has been integrated into the public portal.
- How do you handle obsolete file formats?
- What is your backup strategy?
- Understanding of preservation models
- Technical detail
- Evidence of ongoing monitoring
- Vague mention of 'backup' without strategy
- Identify born‑digital challenges
- Describe OAIS framework steps
- Detail technical actions (validation, fixity, storage)
- Provide long‑term outcome
A university archive held several hundred boxes of outdated administrative records with limited research value.
Appraise the holdings and recommend de‑accession where appropriate.
I applied a documented appraisal policy, consulted with faculty, performed a records lifecycle analysis, and prepared a de‑accession report with recommendations for destruction or transfer to a partner institution.
The archive reduced storage costs by 15% and freed space for high‑value collections, while ensuring compliance with university records retention schedules.
- What criteria determine historical significance?
- How do you handle legal hold requirements?
- Policy adherence
- Stakeholder engagement
- Cost‑benefit awareness
- Ignoring legal considerations
- Explain appraisal policy
- Outline stakeholder consultation
- Detail analysis method
- Summarize outcome and benefits
Situational
A graduate student requested full access to a collection of personal letters from a 20th‑century community organization, some of which contain private health information.
Balance the researcher’s scholarly needs with privacy obligations and institutional policy.
I reviewed the collection’s access restrictions, consulted the privacy policy, and offered a redacted version of the requested materials while arranging a supervised reading room for any non‑redacted items that could be justified under a research exemption.
The researcher completed their dissertation with the redacted materials, and the institution remained compliant with privacy regulations.
- How do you document the decision process?
- What if the researcher disputes the restriction?
- Policy knowledge
- Risk mitigation
- Customer service
- Ignoring privacy laws
- State the request and sensitivity
- Identify policy constraints
- Propose redaction and supervised access
- Outcome that satisfies both parties
A local photographer donated 5,000 negatives, requesting that the archive retain the images but not the copyright.
Incorporate the collection while respecting the donor’s rights and ensuring discoverability.
I negotiated a licensing agreement that allowed the archive to provide access for research and educational use under a Creative Commons Attribution‑NonCommercial license, created detailed metadata indicating copyright status, and stored the digital files in a secure repository with appropriate usage logs.
The collection became a valuable research resource, the donor’s rights were protected, and the archive avoided legal complications.
- What clauses are essential in the agreement?
- How do you track usage under the license?
- Legal awareness
- Negotiation skill
- Metadata clarity
- Assuming ownership without agreement
- Describe donor condition
- Explain licensing negotiation
- Detail metadata and access controls
- Resulting benefits
A simulated flood scenario indicated rising water levels in the basement where 200 boxes of rare maps were stored.
Protect the collections from water damage and ensure staff safety.
I activated the emergency response plan: evacuated personnel, moved high‑value boxes to the upper floor using waterproof pallets, sealed remaining boxes with plastic sheeting, and documented the incident for post‑drill analysis.
All high‑value items were saved without damage, and the drill identified gaps in our relocation equipment, leading to procurement of additional waterproof containers.
- How do you prioritize items during evacuation?
- What long‑term improvements did the drill suggest?
- Crisis management
- Prioritization logic
- Documentation
- No safety considerations
- State emergency context
- Outline evacuation and protection steps
- Document actions
- Post‑drill improvements
A junior archivist suggested adopting a startup’s cloud‑based cataloging platform to replace our legacy system.
Assess the software’s suitability and risk before any migration decision.
I conducted a pilot test on a small collection, evaluated data migration integrity, reviewed security certifications, compared costs, and consulted IT and legal for compliance. I then presented a risk‑benefit analysis to the department head.
The pilot revealed critical data mapping issues, leading us to postpone adoption and instead plan a phased upgrade with a proven vendor, saving potential data loss and compliance risks.
- What criteria are most important for archival software?
- How do you involve stakeholders in the decision?
- Analytical rigor
- Stakeholder communication
- Risk awareness
- Blindly endorsing new tech
- Explain proposal context
- Detail evaluation steps (pilot, security, cost)
- Summarize findings
- Decision outcome
- archival preservation
- metadata standards
- records management
- digital archiving
- collection development
- appraisal