INTERVIEW

Master Your Archivist Interview

Practice proven questions, refine your answers, and land the archival position you deserve.

12 Questions
90 min Prep Time
5 Categories
STAR Method
What You'll Learn
To equip aspiring and current archivists with targeted interview questions, expert model answers, and actionable preparation tips, enabling confident performance in any interview setting.
  • Explore behavioral, technical, and situational questions specific to archival work
  • Review STAR‑formatted model answers crafted by senior archivists
  • Identify key competencies and red‑flag indicators
  • Access a timed practice pack for realistic interview simulation
Difficulty Mix
Easy: 0.4%
Medium: 0.4%
Hard: 0.2%
Prep Overview
Estimated Prep Time: 90 minutes
Formats: Behavioral, Technical, Situational
Competency Map
Records Management: 25%
Preservation Techniques: 20%
Metadata Standards: 20%
Research Support: 20%
Digital Archiving: 15%

Behavioral

Describe a time when you had to convince a stakeholder to adopt a new archival policy.
Situation

At my previous institution, the collections department resisted a new accession policy that required detailed provenance documentation.

Task

I needed to demonstrate the long‑term benefits of the policy for both legal compliance and collection integrity.

Action

I prepared a concise presentation with case studies, organized a workshop, and provided a draft policy template for feedback.

Result

Stakeholders approved the policy within two weeks, leading to a 30% reduction in missing provenance records over the next year.

Follow‑up Questions
  • What metrics did you use to track compliance?
  • How did you handle dissenting opinions during the workshop?
Evaluation Criteria
  • Clarity of situation
  • Demonstrated influence and communication skills
  • Evidence of measurable results
Red Flags to Avoid
  • Vague impact, no data
Answer Outline
  • Explain context and resistance
  • State objective to gain buy‑in
  • Detail communication and collaborative steps
  • Quantify outcome
Tip
Focus on concrete results and stakeholder collaboration.
Tell us about a project where you improved access to a collection for researchers.
Situation

Our regional archive’s oral history collection was stored in analog tapes with limited catalog information.

Task

Increase discoverability and ease of use for academic researchers.

Action

I digitized the tapes, created detailed metadata using Dublin Core, and integrated the collection into the institution’s online portal with a searchable interface.

Result

Research requests rose by 45% within six months, and the collection was cited in three peer‑reviewed articles.

Follow‑up Questions
  • What challenges did you face during digitization?
  • How did you ensure metadata consistency?
Evaluation Criteria
  • Problem identification
  • Technical execution
  • Impact on research community
Red Flags to Avoid
  • No quantifiable outcome
Answer Outline
  • Describe the original access barriers
  • Define the goal of improved accessibility
  • Outline digitization and metadata workflow
  • Provide usage statistics post‑implementation
Tip
Highlight both technical steps and user‑centric benefits.
Give an example of how you handled a conflict within your archival team.
Situation

Two archivists disagreed on the priority of conserving a deteriorating manuscript versus processing new acquisitions.

Task

Resolve the conflict and establish a balanced workflow.

Action

I facilitated a meeting, presented condition reports, and introduced a triage matrix that weighted urgency, research demand, and preservation risk.

Result

The team adopted the matrix, resulting in a 20% faster turnaround for high‑risk items while maintaining acquisition targets.

Follow‑up Questions
  • How did you ensure the matrix remained flexible?
  • What feedback did team members provide afterward?
Evaluation Criteria
  • Conflict resolution approach
  • Use of data‑driven tools
  • Positive change in productivity
Red Flags to Avoid
  • Blaming language
Answer Outline
  • Set the scene of disagreement
  • State the need for resolution
  • Describe the collaborative tool introduced
  • Show the improved workflow outcome
Tip
Emphasize facilitation and data‑backed decision making.
Share a time when you had to adapt quickly to a sudden change in archival regulations.
Situation

A new federal privacy law required immediate redaction of personally identifiable information in digital archives.

Task

Implement compliance across all existing digital collections within 30 days.

Action

I assembled a cross‑functional task force, deployed automated redaction software, and conducted staff training on the new protocol.

Result

All collections were compliant ahead of the deadline, avoiding potential fines and preserving public trust.

Follow‑up Questions
  • What criteria did you use to prioritize collections?
  • How did you verify the accuracy of automated redactions?
Evaluation Criteria
  • Urgency handling
  • Leadership and coordination
  • Compliance verification
Red Flags to Avoid
  • Lack of specific actions
Answer Outline
  • Explain regulatory change
  • Define urgent compliance goal
  • Detail rapid response actions
  • Highlight successful, timely outcome
Tip
Show proactive planning and verification steps.

Technical

What metadata standards are you most familiar with, and how have you applied them in a collection?
Situation

While cataloguing a photographic collection, the institution required adherence to both IPTC and VRA Core standards.

Task

Create metadata records that satisfied both standards without duplicate effort.

Action

I designed a crosswalk table mapping IPTC fields to VRA elements, built a template in our cataloging system, and trained staff on its use.

Result

Metadata entry time decreased by 25%, and the collection met both internal and external discovery requirements.

Follow‑up Questions
  • Why choose those standards for that collection?
  • How do you handle updates to standards?
Evaluation Criteria
  • Knowledge of standards
  • Problem‑solving in mapping
  • Training effectiveness
Red Flags to Avoid
  • Generic answer without specifics
Answer Outline
  • Identify standards used
  • Explain crosswalk creation
  • Describe implementation and training
  • Quantify efficiency gains
Tip
Mention concrete standards and a mapping strategy.
Explain the process you would follow to assess the physical condition of a deteriorating manuscript.
Situation

A 19th‑century diary showed signs of foxing and brittle paper during a routine collection review.

Task

Conduct a thorough condition assessment to determine conservation needs.

Action

I performed a visual inspection under magnification, recorded findings using a standardized condition report form, measured humidity and pH levels, and photographed damage for documentation.

Result

The report informed a grant application that secured funding for professional conservation, extending the diary’s lifespan by an estimated 50 years.

Follow‑up Questions
  • What tools do you use for pH testing?
  • How do you prioritize items for treatment?
Evaluation Criteria
  • Methodical approach
  • Use of appropriate tools
  • Link to preservation outcomes
Red Flags to Avoid
  • Skipping documentation
Answer Outline
  • Describe initial observation
  • Outline systematic assessment steps
  • Document findings
  • Link assessment to conservation action
Tip
Emphasize standardized forms and measurable data.
How do you ensure digital preservation of born‑digital records?
Situation

Our institution received a large batch of email archives and website snapshots from a defunct agency.

Task

Create a sustainable preservation workflow that maintains authenticity and accessibility.

Action

I implemented an OAIS‑based workflow: performed format validation, generated fixity checks, stored files in a secure, redundant repository, and documented provenance metadata using PREMIS.

Result

The digital collection remains accessible after five years, with regular integrity checks showing 0% bit‑rot, and has been integrated into the public portal.

Follow‑up Questions
  • How do you handle obsolete file formats?
  • What is your backup strategy?
Evaluation Criteria
  • Understanding of preservation models
  • Technical detail
  • Evidence of ongoing monitoring
Red Flags to Avoid
  • Vague mention of 'backup' without strategy
Answer Outline
  • Identify born‑digital challenges
  • Describe OAIS framework steps
  • Detail technical actions (validation, fixity, storage)
  • Provide long‑term outcome
Tip
Reference recognized models and standards.
Describe your experience with archival appraisal and de‑accessioning.
Situation

A university archive held several hundred boxes of outdated administrative records with limited research value.

Task

Appraise the holdings and recommend de‑accession where appropriate.

Action

I applied a documented appraisal policy, consulted with faculty, performed a records lifecycle analysis, and prepared a de‑accession report with recommendations for destruction or transfer to a partner institution.

Result

The archive reduced storage costs by 15% and freed space for high‑value collections, while ensuring compliance with university records retention schedules.

Follow‑up Questions
  • What criteria determine historical significance?
  • How do you handle legal hold requirements?
Evaluation Criteria
  • Policy adherence
  • Stakeholder engagement
  • Cost‑benefit awareness
Red Flags to Avoid
  • Ignoring legal considerations
Answer Outline
  • Explain appraisal policy
  • Outline stakeholder consultation
  • Detail analysis method
  • Summarize outcome and benefits
Tip
Show balance between preservation and resource management.

Situational

If a researcher requests access to a restricted collection that contains sensitive personal data, how would you handle the request?
Situation

A graduate student requested full access to a collection of personal letters from a 20th‑century community organization, some of which contain private health information.

Task

Balance the researcher’s scholarly needs with privacy obligations and institutional policy.

Action

I reviewed the collection’s access restrictions, consulted the privacy policy, and offered a redacted version of the requested materials while arranging a supervised reading room for any non‑redacted items that could be justified under a research exemption.

Result

The researcher completed their dissertation with the redacted materials, and the institution remained compliant with privacy regulations.

Follow‑up Questions
  • How do you document the decision process?
  • What if the researcher disputes the restriction?
Evaluation Criteria
  • Policy knowledge
  • Risk mitigation
  • Customer service
Red Flags to Avoid
  • Ignoring privacy laws
Answer Outline
  • State the request and sensitivity
  • Identify policy constraints
  • Propose redaction and supervised access
  • Outcome that satisfies both parties
Tip
Emphasize documentation and collaborative solutions.
A donor offers a large collection of photographs but insists on retaining copyright. How would you proceed?
Situation

A local photographer donated 5,000 negatives, requesting that the archive retain the images but not the copyright.

Task

Incorporate the collection while respecting the donor’s rights and ensuring discoverability.

Action

I negotiated a licensing agreement that allowed the archive to provide access for research and educational use under a Creative Commons Attribution‑NonCommercial license, created detailed metadata indicating copyright status, and stored the digital files in a secure repository with appropriate usage logs.

Result

The collection became a valuable research resource, the donor’s rights were protected, and the archive avoided legal complications.

Follow‑up Questions
  • What clauses are essential in the agreement?
  • How do you track usage under the license?
Evaluation Criteria
  • Legal awareness
  • Negotiation skill
  • Metadata clarity
Red Flags to Avoid
  • Assuming ownership without agreement
Answer Outline
  • Describe donor condition
  • Explain licensing negotiation
  • Detail metadata and access controls
  • Resulting benefits
Tip
Highlight clear licensing terms and metadata transparency.
During a disaster drill, a flood threatens the basement storage where some archival boxes are kept. What immediate actions do you take?
Situation

A simulated flood scenario indicated rising water levels in the basement where 200 boxes of rare maps were stored.

Task

Protect the collections from water damage and ensure staff safety.

Action

I activated the emergency response plan: evacuated personnel, moved high‑value boxes to the upper floor using waterproof pallets, sealed remaining boxes with plastic sheeting, and documented the incident for post‑drill analysis.

Result

All high‑value items were saved without damage, and the drill identified gaps in our relocation equipment, leading to procurement of additional waterproof containers.

Follow‑up Questions
  • How do you prioritize items during evacuation?
  • What long‑term improvements did the drill suggest?
Evaluation Criteria
  • Crisis management
  • Prioritization logic
  • Documentation
Red Flags to Avoid
  • No safety considerations
Answer Outline
  • State emergency context
  • Outline evacuation and protection steps
  • Document actions
  • Post‑drill improvements
Tip
Show clear hierarchy of value and safety first.
A colleague proposes using a new, untested archival software for cataloging. How would you evaluate and respond?
Situation

A junior archivist suggested adopting a startup’s cloud‑based cataloging platform to replace our legacy system.

Task

Assess the software’s suitability and risk before any migration decision.

Action

I conducted a pilot test on a small collection, evaluated data migration integrity, reviewed security certifications, compared costs, and consulted IT and legal for compliance. I then presented a risk‑benefit analysis to the department head.

Result

The pilot revealed critical data mapping issues, leading us to postpone adoption and instead plan a phased upgrade with a proven vendor, saving potential data loss and compliance risks.

Follow‑up Questions
  • What criteria are most important for archival software?
  • How do you involve stakeholders in the decision?
Evaluation Criteria
  • Analytical rigor
  • Stakeholder communication
  • Risk awareness
Red Flags to Avoid
  • Blindly endorsing new tech
Answer Outline
  • Explain proposal context
  • Detail evaluation steps (pilot, security, cost)
  • Summarize findings
  • Decision outcome
Tip
Stress systematic testing and stakeholder buy‑in.
ATS Tips
  • archival preservation
  • metadata standards
  • records management
  • digital archiving
  • collection development
  • appraisal
Get a tailored archivist resume
Practice Pack
Timed Rounds: 30 minutes
Mix: Behavioral, Technical, Situational

Boost your interview confidence with our free practice pack!

Download Practice Pack

More Interview Guides

Check out Resumly's Free AI Tools