INTERVIEW

Ace Your Cardiologist Interview

Master clinical, procedural, and behavioral questions with proven answers and practice tools

12 Questions
120 min Prep Time
5 Categories
STAR Method
What You'll Learn
To equip aspiring and practicing cardiologists with the most relevant interview questions, expert model answers, and targeted practice resources so they can confidently demonstrate their expertise and secure their next role.
  • Comprehensive set of clinical and behavioral questions
  • STAR‑based model answers for each question
  • Competency weighting to focus study effort
  • Timed practice pack for realistic interview simulation
Difficulty Mix
Easy: 0.4%
Medium: 0.4%
Hard: 0.2%
Prep Overview
Estimated Prep Time: 120 minutes
Formats: Multiple Choice, Behavioral, Case Study
Competency Map
Clinical Knowledge: 25%
Patient Communication: 20%
Diagnostic Skills: 20%
Procedural Expertise: 20%
Research & Education: 15%

Clinical Knowledge

Explain the pathophysiology of acute myocardial infarction and the immediate management steps you would take in the emergency department.
Situation

A 58‑year‑old male presents with crushing chest pain radiating to the left arm, diaphoresis, and shortness of breath.

Task

Stabilize the patient, confirm diagnosis, and initiate reperfusion therapy as quickly as possible.

Action

Administer aspirin, sublingual nitroglycerin, and oxygen; obtain a 12‑lead ECG within 10 minutes; activate the cath lab for primary PCI; give anticoagulation (heparin) and consider P2Y12 inhibitor; monitor vitals and provide analgesia.

Result

ECG shows ST‑elevation in leads II, III, aVF; patient undergoes successful PCI with restoration of flow, pain resolves, and troponin trend stabilizes.

Follow‑up Questions
  • How would you manage a patient who is allergic to aspirin?
  • What are the contraindications for thrombolytic therapy?
Evaluation Criteria
  • Clarity of pathophysiology explanation
  • Prioritization of life‑saving interventions
  • Awareness of guideline‑directed therapy
  • Ability to adapt to contraindications
Red Flags to Avoid
  • Omitting ECG timing
  • Failing to mention reperfusion urgency
Answer Outline
  • Describe plaque rupture and thrombus formation
  • List immediate pharmacologic measures (ASA, nitro, anticoagulation)
  • Emphasize rapid ECG and activation of reperfusion pathway
  • Detail PCI steps and post‑procedure monitoring
Tip
Memorize the 10‑minute ECG rule and the acronym MONA‑B (Morphine, Oxygen, Nitrates, Aspirin, Beta‑blocker) for early MI care.
What are the indications for prescribing a beta‑blocker after a myocardial infarction?
Situation

Post‑PCI patient with uncomplicated anterior STEMI, stable hemodynamics.

Task

Determine whether a beta‑blocker should be initiated to improve long‑term outcomes.

Action

Review guidelines: start beta‑blocker within 24 hours if no signs of heart failure, bradycardia <60 bpm, hypotension <90/60 mmHg, or contraindicating pulmonary disease; choose metoprolol succinate and titrate to target HR 50‑60 bpm.

Result

Patient tolerates beta‑blocker, HR reduces to 58 bpm, no adverse events, and 1‑year follow‑up shows reduced recurrent ischemia.

Follow‑up Questions
  • How would you manage a patient with mild asthma?
  • When would you consider switching to a different class of anti‑anginal medication?
Evaluation Criteria
  • Knowledge of guideline timing
  • Recognition of contraindications
  • Appropriate drug selection
  • Clear dosing rationale
Red Flags to Avoid
  • Recommending beta‑blocker in acute decompensated HF
Answer Outline
  • Guideline‑based timing (within 24 h)
  • Contraindications (HF, bradycardia, hypotension, severe COPD)
  • Choice of cardioselective agent
  • Target heart‑rate range
Tip
Use the mnemonic ‘B‑BLOCK’ – Blood pressure, Lung disease, Output, Cardiac conduction, K‑levels (electrolytes) – to quickly screen for contraindications.
Describe how you would interpret a transthoracic echocardiogram that shows an ejection fraction of 35% with regional wall motion abnormalities.
Situation

A 65‑year‑old female with a history of hypertension presents for routine follow‑up after a prior NSTEMI.

Task

Assess cardiac function and determine implications for management.

Action

Identify reduced EF (35%) indicating systolic dysfunction; note hypokinetic segments in the inferior wall consistent with prior infarct; evaluate for valvular disease, diastolic parameters, and pulmonary pressures; recommend guideline‑directed medical therapy (ACE‑I/ARB, beta‑blocker, mineralocorticoid antagonist) and consider referral for cardiac rehab.

Result

Therapy optimized, EF improves to 40% over six months, symptoms stable, and patient remains active in rehab.

Follow‑up Questions
  • What additional imaging would you order if you suspect a ventricular thrombus?
  • How does the presence of diastolic dysfunction modify your management?
Evaluation Criteria
  • Accurate echo interpretation
  • Correlation with clinical history
  • Evidence‑based treatment recommendations
  • Patient‑centered follow‑up plan
Red Flags to Avoid
  • Mislabeling EF as normal
Answer Outline
  • Define EF and its clinical significance
  • Identify regional wall motion abnormality pattern
  • Link findings to prior MI territory
  • Outline evidence‑based treatment plan
Tip
Remember that EF <40% qualifies as heart failure with reduced EF (HFrEF) and triggers specific pharmacologic classes.

Behavioral

Tell me about a time you had to deliver bad news to a patient or family member regarding a cardiac condition.
Situation

A 72‑year‑old man with severe aortic stenosis was evaluated for surgical replacement, but his comorbidities made him high‑risk.

Task

Communicate the recommendation against surgery and discuss alternative management.

Action

Scheduled a private meeting, used clear, compassionate language, explained risks versus benefits, provided visual aids of valve anatomy, listened to concerns, and offered a shared decision‑making approach with medical therapy and close monitoring.

Result

Family appreciated the honesty, patient opted for transcatheter valve implantation under a modified protocol, and expressed confidence in the care plan.

Follow‑up Questions
  • How do you handle a family that insists on aggressive treatment despite high risk?
  • What strategies do you use to ensure the patient understands complex cardiac terminology?
Evaluation Criteria
  • Empathy demonstrated
  • Clarity of explanation
  • Shared decision‑making emphasis
  • Professional composure
Red Flags to Avoid
  • Using overly technical jargon without checking understanding
Answer Outline
  • Set the scene and relationship
  • Explain the medical facts plainly
  • Show empathy and active listening
  • Offer alternatives and next steps
Tip
Use the SPIKES protocol (Setting, Perception, Invitation, Knowledge, Emotions, Strategy) for delivering serious news.
Describe a situation where you had a disagreement with a multidisciplinary team member about a patient’s treatment plan. How did you resolve it?
Situation

During a heart failure conference, a cardiothoracic surgeon advocated for early LVAD implantation, while I felt optimal medical therapy had not been maximized.

Task

Reach consensus on the safest, evidence‑based pathway for the patient.

Action

Presented recent guideline data, reviewed the patient’s hemodynamics, invited the surgeon to discuss concerns, and proposed a trial of inotropic support with close monitoring before committing to LVAD; scheduled a follow‑up multidisciplinary meeting to reassess.

Result

Team agreed to the trial, patient stabilized, and LVAD was avoided; the collaborative approach reinforced mutual respect.

Follow‑up Questions
  • What if the team member remains unconvinced after presenting data?
  • How do you document such disagreements in the medical record?
Evaluation Criteria
  • Evidence‑based argumentation
  • Team‑centered communication
  • Conflict resolution skills
  • Patient safety focus
Red Flags to Avoid
  • Undermining the colleague publicly
Answer Outline
  • State the conflict clearly
  • Provide evidence‑based rationale
  • Facilitate open dialogue
  • Propose a compromise with monitoring
Tip
Frame disagreements around patient outcomes, not personal opinions, and always document the discussion and agreed plan.
Give an example of how you stay current with advances in cardiology and integrate new knowledge into your practice.
Situation

Cardiology is rapidly evolving with new trials on SGLT2 inhibitors for heart failure.

Task

Continuously update knowledge and apply it to patient care.

Action

Subscribe to major journals (JACC, Circulation), attend annual ACC meetings, participate in local journal clubs, and complete CME modules; after the EMPEROR‑Reduced trial, I incorporated SGLT2 inhibitors into guideline‑directed therapy for eligible HFrEF patients.

Result

Within six months, 30% of my HFrEF cohort started SGLT2 inhibitors, showing improved NYHA class and reduced hospitalizations.

Follow‑up Questions
  • How do you evaluate the quality of a new study before changing practice?
  • What barriers have you faced when implementing new therapies?
Evaluation Criteria
  • Commitment to lifelong learning
  • Critical appraisal skills
  • Practical implementation plan
  • Outcome monitoring
Red Flags to Avoid
  • Citing non‑peer‑reviewed sources as primary evidence
Answer Outline
  • Identify reliable sources (journals, conferences)
  • Engage in peer discussion (journal clubs)
  • Translate trial data into practice guidelines
  • Track outcomes after implementation
Tip
Maintain a personal ‘knowledge‑to‑practice’ log to track new evidence, decision points, and patient outcomes.

Procedural

Walk me through the steps you take to perform a coronary angiography, emphasizing safety and patient comfort.
Situation

Patient scheduled for diagnostic coronary angiography due to atypical chest pain and positive stress test.

Task

Conduct the procedure safely while minimizing discomfort and radiation exposure.

Action

Obtain informed consent, verify allergies, ensure IV access, administer pre‑procedure sedation; use radial artery access with ultrasound guidance; administer heparin weight‑based; perform diagnostic runs with low‑frame rate fluoroscopy; monitor vitals continuously; achieve hemostasis with a compression device post‑procedure; provide post‑procedure monitoring for complications.

Result

Procedure completed without complications, patient reported minimal discomfort, and no access site issues observed during 4‑hour post‑procedure observation.

Follow‑up Questions
  • What would you do if you encountered severe radial spasm?
  • How do you manage a patient who develops contrast‑induced nephropathy?
Evaluation Criteria
  • Adherence to safety protocols
  • Patient‑centered comfort measures
  • Technical proficiency description
  • Complication mitigation
Red Flags to Avoid
  • Skipping anticoagulation
Answer Outline
  • Pre‑procedure checklist (consent, labs, meds)
  • Radial vs femoral access decision
  • Ultrasound‑guided puncture
  • Anticoagulation dosing
  • Fluoroscopy technique to reduce dose
  • Hemostasis and post‑procedure care
Tip
Radial access reduces bleeding complications; always have a femoral backup plan.
How do you assess and manage a patient who develops atrial fibrillation during a cardiac catheterization procedure?
Situation

During a left heart catheterization, the patient’s rhythm changes to rapid irregularly irregular AF with HR 130 bpm.

Task

Stabilize rhythm, ensure hemodynamic stability, and decide on immediate management versus post‑procedure strategy.

Action

Immediately assess blood pressure and symptoms; if stable, administer IV beta‑blocker (esmolol) to control rate; consider anticoagulation if procedure >30 min and CHA₂DS₂‑VASc ≥2; monitor for hypotension; if hemodynamically unstable, prepare for synchronized cardioversion; document episode and arrange outpatient electrophysiology follow‑up.

Result

Rate controlled to 80 bpm, patient remained stable, procedure completed, and AF was successfully managed with outpatient ablation planning.

Follow‑up Questions
  • When is it appropriate to start a DOAC during the same admission?
  • What are the risks of using amiodarone in the cath lab setting?
Evaluation Criteria
  • Prompt recognition of arrhythmia
  • Appropriate pharmacologic or electrical intervention
  • Safety considerations (BP, anticoagulation)
  • Clear follow‑up strategy
Red Flags to Avoid
  • Delaying rate control in a symptomatic patient
Answer Outline
  • Rapid assessment of hemodynamics
  • Rate control options (beta‑blocker, calcium channel blocker)
  • Anticoagulation considerations intra‑procedure
  • Criteria for emergent cardioversion
  • Post‑procedure follow‑up plan
Tip
Esmolol’s short half‑life makes it ideal for rapid, titratable rate control during procedures.
Explain your approach to performing a transesophageal echocardiogram (TEE) for pre‑operative assessment of a patient with suspected valvular disease.
Situation

A 70‑year‑old patient with severe mitral regurgitation is being evaluated for surgical repair.

Task

Obtain high‑quality TEE images to assess valve anatomy, severity, and suitability for repair versus replacement.

Action

Review contraindications (esophageal pathology), obtain informed consent, ensure fasting, administer topical anesthetic and conscious sedation; insert probe with gentle advancement under direct visualization; acquire standard TEE views (mid‑esophageal, trans‑gastric) focusing on mitral valve morphology, regurgitant jet, leaflet motion, and annular dimensions; document measurements; monitor vitals and oxygenation throughout.

Result

TEE confirmed posterior leaflet prolapse with flail segment, suitable for minimally invasive repair; surgical team proceeded with successful mitral valve repair.

Follow‑up Questions
  • How would you modify the exam if the patient has a known esophageal stricture?
  • What findings would prompt you to recommend valve replacement instead of repair?
Evaluation Criteria
  • Safety and patient tolerance
  • Comprehensiveness of imaging protocol
  • Accurate interpretation of valvular pathology
  • Clear communication of findings
Red Flags to Avoid
  • Inadequate sedation leading to patient movement
Answer Outline
  • Pre‑procedure safety checks
  • Sedation and probe insertion technique
  • Key imaging planes for mitral assessment
  • Measurement criteria for repair eligibility
Tip
Memorize the 0°, 45°, 90°, and 135° trans‑gastric views to ensure complete valve assessment.
ATS Tips
  • cardiac catheterization
  • echocardiography
  • heart failure management
  • interventional cardiology
  • patient communication
  • evidence‑based medicine
Download our cardiologist resume template to highlight these skills
Practice Pack
Timed Rounds: 45 minutes
Mix: Clinical Knowledge, Behavioral, Procedural

Ready to land your dream cardiology job?

Get Your Free Interview Pack

More Interview Guides

Check out Resumly's Free AI Tools