Ace Your Cardiologist Interview
Master clinical, procedural, and behavioral questions with proven answers and practice tools
- Comprehensive set of clinical and behavioral questions
- STAR‑based model answers for each question
- Competency weighting to focus study effort
- Timed practice pack for realistic interview simulation
Clinical Knowledge
A 58‑year‑old male presents with crushing chest pain radiating to the left arm, diaphoresis, and shortness of breath.
Stabilize the patient, confirm diagnosis, and initiate reperfusion therapy as quickly as possible.
Administer aspirin, sublingual nitroglycerin, and oxygen; obtain a 12‑lead ECG within 10 minutes; activate the cath lab for primary PCI; give anticoagulation (heparin) and consider P2Y12 inhibitor; monitor vitals and provide analgesia.
ECG shows ST‑elevation in leads II, III, aVF; patient undergoes successful PCI with restoration of flow, pain resolves, and troponin trend stabilizes.
- How would you manage a patient who is allergic to aspirin?
- What are the contraindications for thrombolytic therapy?
- Clarity of pathophysiology explanation
- Prioritization of life‑saving interventions
- Awareness of guideline‑directed therapy
- Ability to adapt to contraindications
- Omitting ECG timing
- Failing to mention reperfusion urgency
- Describe plaque rupture and thrombus formation
- List immediate pharmacologic measures (ASA, nitro, anticoagulation)
- Emphasize rapid ECG and activation of reperfusion pathway
- Detail PCI steps and post‑procedure monitoring
Post‑PCI patient with uncomplicated anterior STEMI, stable hemodynamics.
Determine whether a beta‑blocker should be initiated to improve long‑term outcomes.
Review guidelines: start beta‑blocker within 24 hours if no signs of heart failure, bradycardia <60 bpm, hypotension <90/60 mmHg, or contraindicating pulmonary disease; choose metoprolol succinate and titrate to target HR 50‑60 bpm.
Patient tolerates beta‑blocker, HR reduces to 58 bpm, no adverse events, and 1‑year follow‑up shows reduced recurrent ischemia.
- How would you manage a patient with mild asthma?
- When would you consider switching to a different class of anti‑anginal medication?
- Knowledge of guideline timing
- Recognition of contraindications
- Appropriate drug selection
- Clear dosing rationale
- Recommending beta‑blocker in acute decompensated HF
- Guideline‑based timing (within 24 h)
- Contraindications (HF, bradycardia, hypotension, severe COPD)
- Choice of cardioselective agent
- Target heart‑rate range
A 65‑year‑old female with a history of hypertension presents for routine follow‑up after a prior NSTEMI.
Assess cardiac function and determine implications for management.
Identify reduced EF (35%) indicating systolic dysfunction; note hypokinetic segments in the inferior wall consistent with prior infarct; evaluate for valvular disease, diastolic parameters, and pulmonary pressures; recommend guideline‑directed medical therapy (ACE‑I/ARB, beta‑blocker, mineralocorticoid antagonist) and consider referral for cardiac rehab.
Therapy optimized, EF improves to 40% over six months, symptoms stable, and patient remains active in rehab.
- What additional imaging would you order if you suspect a ventricular thrombus?
- How does the presence of diastolic dysfunction modify your management?
- Accurate echo interpretation
- Correlation with clinical history
- Evidence‑based treatment recommendations
- Patient‑centered follow‑up plan
- Mislabeling EF as normal
- Define EF and its clinical significance
- Identify regional wall motion abnormality pattern
- Link findings to prior MI territory
- Outline evidence‑based treatment plan
Behavioral
A 72‑year‑old man with severe aortic stenosis was evaluated for surgical replacement, but his comorbidities made him high‑risk.
Communicate the recommendation against surgery and discuss alternative management.
Scheduled a private meeting, used clear, compassionate language, explained risks versus benefits, provided visual aids of valve anatomy, listened to concerns, and offered a shared decision‑making approach with medical therapy and close monitoring.
Family appreciated the honesty, patient opted for transcatheter valve implantation under a modified protocol, and expressed confidence in the care plan.
- How do you handle a family that insists on aggressive treatment despite high risk?
- What strategies do you use to ensure the patient understands complex cardiac terminology?
- Empathy demonstrated
- Clarity of explanation
- Shared decision‑making emphasis
- Professional composure
- Using overly technical jargon without checking understanding
- Set the scene and relationship
- Explain the medical facts plainly
- Show empathy and active listening
- Offer alternatives and next steps
During a heart failure conference, a cardiothoracic surgeon advocated for early LVAD implantation, while I felt optimal medical therapy had not been maximized.
Reach consensus on the safest, evidence‑based pathway for the patient.
Presented recent guideline data, reviewed the patient’s hemodynamics, invited the surgeon to discuss concerns, and proposed a trial of inotropic support with close monitoring before committing to LVAD; scheduled a follow‑up multidisciplinary meeting to reassess.
Team agreed to the trial, patient stabilized, and LVAD was avoided; the collaborative approach reinforced mutual respect.
- What if the team member remains unconvinced after presenting data?
- How do you document such disagreements in the medical record?
- Evidence‑based argumentation
- Team‑centered communication
- Conflict resolution skills
- Patient safety focus
- Undermining the colleague publicly
- State the conflict clearly
- Provide evidence‑based rationale
- Facilitate open dialogue
- Propose a compromise with monitoring
Cardiology is rapidly evolving with new trials on SGLT2 inhibitors for heart failure.
Continuously update knowledge and apply it to patient care.
Subscribe to major journals (JACC, Circulation), attend annual ACC meetings, participate in local journal clubs, and complete CME modules; after the EMPEROR‑Reduced trial, I incorporated SGLT2 inhibitors into guideline‑directed therapy for eligible HFrEF patients.
Within six months, 30% of my HFrEF cohort started SGLT2 inhibitors, showing improved NYHA class and reduced hospitalizations.
- How do you evaluate the quality of a new study before changing practice?
- What barriers have you faced when implementing new therapies?
- Commitment to lifelong learning
- Critical appraisal skills
- Practical implementation plan
- Outcome monitoring
- Citing non‑peer‑reviewed sources as primary evidence
- Identify reliable sources (journals, conferences)
- Engage in peer discussion (journal clubs)
- Translate trial data into practice guidelines
- Track outcomes after implementation
Procedural
Patient scheduled for diagnostic coronary angiography due to atypical chest pain and positive stress test.
Conduct the procedure safely while minimizing discomfort and radiation exposure.
Obtain informed consent, verify allergies, ensure IV access, administer pre‑procedure sedation; use radial artery access with ultrasound guidance; administer heparin weight‑based; perform diagnostic runs with low‑frame rate fluoroscopy; monitor vitals continuously; achieve hemostasis with a compression device post‑procedure; provide post‑procedure monitoring for complications.
Procedure completed without complications, patient reported minimal discomfort, and no access site issues observed during 4‑hour post‑procedure observation.
- What would you do if you encountered severe radial spasm?
- How do you manage a patient who develops contrast‑induced nephropathy?
- Adherence to safety protocols
- Patient‑centered comfort measures
- Technical proficiency description
- Complication mitigation
- Skipping anticoagulation
- Pre‑procedure checklist (consent, labs, meds)
- Radial vs femoral access decision
- Ultrasound‑guided puncture
- Anticoagulation dosing
- Fluoroscopy technique to reduce dose
- Hemostasis and post‑procedure care
During a left heart catheterization, the patient’s rhythm changes to rapid irregularly irregular AF with HR 130 bpm.
Stabilize rhythm, ensure hemodynamic stability, and decide on immediate management versus post‑procedure strategy.
Immediately assess blood pressure and symptoms; if stable, administer IV beta‑blocker (esmolol) to control rate; consider anticoagulation if procedure >30 min and CHA₂DS₂‑VASc ≥2; monitor for hypotension; if hemodynamically unstable, prepare for synchronized cardioversion; document episode and arrange outpatient electrophysiology follow‑up.
Rate controlled to 80 bpm, patient remained stable, procedure completed, and AF was successfully managed with outpatient ablation planning.
- When is it appropriate to start a DOAC during the same admission?
- What are the risks of using amiodarone in the cath lab setting?
- Prompt recognition of arrhythmia
- Appropriate pharmacologic or electrical intervention
- Safety considerations (BP, anticoagulation)
- Clear follow‑up strategy
- Delaying rate control in a symptomatic patient
- Rapid assessment of hemodynamics
- Rate control options (beta‑blocker, calcium channel blocker)
- Anticoagulation considerations intra‑procedure
- Criteria for emergent cardioversion
- Post‑procedure follow‑up plan
A 70‑year‑old patient with severe mitral regurgitation is being evaluated for surgical repair.
Obtain high‑quality TEE images to assess valve anatomy, severity, and suitability for repair versus replacement.
Review contraindications (esophageal pathology), obtain informed consent, ensure fasting, administer topical anesthetic and conscious sedation; insert probe with gentle advancement under direct visualization; acquire standard TEE views (mid‑esophageal, trans‑gastric) focusing on mitral valve morphology, regurgitant jet, leaflet motion, and annular dimensions; document measurements; monitor vitals and oxygenation throughout.
TEE confirmed posterior leaflet prolapse with flail segment, suitable for minimally invasive repair; surgical team proceeded with successful mitral valve repair.
- How would you modify the exam if the patient has a known esophageal stricture?
- What findings would prompt you to recommend valve replacement instead of repair?
- Safety and patient tolerance
- Comprehensiveness of imaging protocol
- Accurate interpretation of valvular pathology
- Clear communication of findings
- Inadequate sedation leading to patient movement
- Pre‑procedure safety checks
- Sedation and probe insertion technique
- Key imaging planes for mitral assessment
- Measurement criteria for repair eligibility
- cardiac catheterization
- echocardiography
- heart failure management
- interventional cardiology
- patient communication
- evidence‑based medicine