Ace Your Private Equity Analyst Interview
Master technical, deal‑execution, and behavioral questions with expert model answers and actionable tips.
- Cover technical, valuation, and deal‑sourcing scenarios
- Provide STAR‑structured model answers
- Highlight key competencies and evaluation criteria
- Identify red flags and how to avoid them
- Offer a timed practice pack for realistic rehearsal
Technical Skills
While interning at a boutique PE firm, we were evaluating a mid‑market manufacturing target.
I was tasked with building a full‑stack DCF model to assess the target’s intrinsic value and support the investment memo.
I gathered historical financials, projected cash flows for five years, calculated free cash flow, selected an appropriate WACC based on comparable firms, applied a terminal growth rate, and performed sensitivity analysis on key assumptions. I documented each step in a clean Excel workbook and created visual dashboards for the partners.
The model indicated an enterprise value 12% below the asking price, which helped the team negotiate a favorable purchase price and ultimately contributed to a successful acquisition that generated a 15% IRR over three years.
- How did you determine the appropriate discount rate?
- What sensitivity variables did you test and why?
- How would you adjust the model for a high‑growth target?
- Clarity of assumptions and sources
- Depth of financial projection logic
- Accuracy of discounting methodology
- Use of sensitivity analysis
- Ability to translate results into investment rationale
- Vague description of inputs
- No mention of WACC or terminal value
- Lack of sensitivity analysis
- Overly generic results without quantification
- Collect historical income statements and balance sheets
- Project revenue, EBITDA, capex, and working‑capital changes
- Calculate free cash flow for each forecast year
- Determine WACC and terminal growth rate
- Discount cash flows to present value
- Run sensitivity tables on WACC and growth assumptions
- Summarize findings in a concise memo
During my role as a research analyst at a financial advisory firm, I was responsible for generating deal pipelines for the private equity team.
Identify emerging trends and sectors with attractive entry points for investment.
I subscribed to industry newsletters, monitored M&A databases, attended sector conferences, and built a weekly dashboard tracking revenue growth, M&A activity, and regulatory changes. I also conducted Porter’s Five Forces analyses for top‑performing sub‑sectors and shared concise briefs with the deal team.
The systematic approach surfaced three high‑growth fintech sub‑sectors, leading to two deal opportunities that progressed to term sheet stage within six months.
- Which data sources do you trust most for industry insights?
- How do you differentiate between a hype cycle and a sustainable trend?
- Breadth and relevance of data sources
- Analytical framework applied
- Clarity and conciseness of presentation
- Ability to link trends to investment theses
- Relying solely on press releases
- No structured framework for analysis
- Failure to tie trends to actionable deal ideas
- Gather macro‑economic data and sector reports
- Track key performance indicators (growth, margins, M&A volume)
- Perform competitive landscape analysis (Porter’s Five Forces)
- Create a visual dashboard for quick reference
- Present findings in a 5‑minute briefing to the investment team
Deal Execution
I was part of a two‑person team conducting due diligence on a SaaS company valued at $200 M.
Lead the financial due diligence, identify any red flags, and communicate findings to senior partners.
I built a detailed revenue quality model, reconciled GAAP and non‑GAAP metrics, and coordinated with the target’s CFO to obtain granular data. I uncovered a discrepancy in churn assumptions, escalated it to the partners, and worked with the target to adjust the forecast. I also prepared a risk‑adjusted valuation summary and presented it in a joint meeting with legal and operational teams.
The revised model reduced the purchase price by $12 M and incorporated earn‑out provisions tied to post‑close revenue targets, ultimately protecting the firm’s upside while securing the deal.
- What specific metrics did you focus on for a SaaS business?
- How did you handle pushback from the target’s management?
- Depth of financial analysis
- Ability to spot and quantify risks
- Communication effectiveness with multiple stakeholders
- Impact of findings on deal terms
- Skipping detailed revenue quality checks
- Providing only high‑level observations
- Inability to quantify the financial impact of identified issues
- Collect and reconcile historical financial statements
- Validate revenue recognition and churn assumptions
- Build a revenue quality and cash‑flow model
- Identify material discrepancies and discuss with target management
- Prepare a risk‑adjusted valuation and executive summary
Our firm received three inbound deal teasers within a single week, each with potential upside but limited analyst bandwidth.
Create a prioritization framework to allocate resources efficiently and ensure high‑impact opportunities receive attention first.
I developed a scoring matrix based on deal size, strategic fit, expected IRR, and data availability. I ran quick preliminary valuations for each and presented the scores to the senior team. I then allocated analyst hours proportionally, focusing deep‑dive work on the top‑scoring deal while maintaining a high‑level review of the others.
The framework enabled us to close the highest‑scoring deal within the deadline, achieving a 20% IRR, while the other two deals were either passed on or scheduled for later review, optimizing team productivity.
- What weighting system do you use for the scoring matrix?
- How do you handle senior partners who favor a particular deal?
- Logical and transparent scoring methodology
- Alignment with firm’s investment strategy
- Effective communication of prioritization decisions
- Demonstrated impact on deal outcomes
- No clear framework, relying on gut feeling
- Ignoring data availability constraints
- Failure to communicate rationale
- Define key criteria (size, fit, IRR, data readiness)
- Assign weights to each criterion
- Score each deal quickly using available data
- Rank deals and allocate analyst hours accordingly
- Communicate the rationale to senior stakeholders
- private equity
- financial modeling
- valuation
- due diligence
- deal sourcing
- M&A