Ace Your Web Developer Interview
Master the most common technical and behavioral questions with detailed answers and actionable tips.
- Curated questions covering frontâend, backâend, and softâskill topics
- STARâbased model answers for behavioral questions
- Stepâbyâstep answer outlines for quick review
- Tips and redâflags to avoid common pitfalls
- Downloadable practice pack for timed mock interviews
Technical Fundamentals
While building a responsive landing page, the designer asked why elements were not aligning as expected.
I needed to clarify how the box model determines the total space an element occupies.
I described that each element consists of content, padding, border, and margin. I showed how width and height apply to the content box and how padding and border add to the total size, while margin creates space outside the border. I also mentioned the box-sizing property and its impact.
The designer understood the calculations, switched to box-sizing:border-box, and the layout issues were resolved without extra CSS hacks.
- How does box-sizing:border-box change the layout calculations?
- What is margin collapse and when does it occur?
- Accurate definition of each box model component
- Clear explanation of how total width/height is calculated
- Mention of box-sizing property
- Use of a practical example
- Confusing padding with margin
- Omitting border in size calculations
- Content area â the actual text or media
- Padding â space inside the border
- Border â visual outline
- Margin â space outside the border
- box-sizing controls whether padding/border are included in width/height
During a code review, a teammate used == to compare a user input string with a numeric ID, causing unexpected matches.
Explain why strict equality is preferred and the pitfalls of loose equality.
I clarified that == performs type coercion before comparison, which can lead to truthy/falsey surprises (e.g., '0' == 0 is true). === checks both value and type, ensuring a true match only when both are identical. I gave examples and recommended always using === unless intentional coercion is needed.
The team updated the code to use ===, eliminating bugs related to unintended type conversion.
- When might you intentionally use ==?
- How does Object.is differ from ===?
- Correct definition of both operators
- Clear examples illustrating the difference
- Bestâpractice recommendation
- Stating that == is always wrong without context
- == performs type coercion before comparison
- === checks value and type without coercion
- Examples: '5' == 5 (true) vs '5' === 5 (false)
- Best practice: use === for predictable results
Front-End Development
A client requested a new interactive carousel that must work on Chrome, Firefox, Safari, and Edge.
Develop the carousel while guaranteeing consistent behavior across browsers.
I started with standardsâcompliant HTML5 and CSS3, avoided vendorâspecific properties, and used feature detection via Modernizr. I wrote JavaScript using ES6 with Babel transpilation for older browsers and polyfilled missing APIs. I tested the component in BrowserStack and added fallback styles for browsers lacking support.
The carousel functioned smoothly on all target browsers, and the client reported zero visual glitches.
- What tools can automate crossâbrowser testing?
- How do you handle CSS Grid in older browsers?
- Emphasis on standards, feature detection, and testing
- Specific tools mentioned (Babel, Modernizr, BrowserStack)
- Fallback strategies
- Relying solely on vendor prefixes without detection
- Write semantic, standardsâcompliant markup
- Use CSS with fallbacks and vendor prefixes only when necessary
- Leverage feature detection (e.g., Modernizr)
- Transpile ES6+ code with Babel
- Polyfill missing APIs
- Test on real browsers or services like BrowserStack
The marketing team noticed a 5âsecond load time on the homepage, affecting bounce rates.
Identify and implement performance improvements to reduce load time.
I audited the page with Lighthouse, then applied three key techniques: (1) lazyâload images and offâscreen content, (2) split JavaScript bundles using codeâsplitting and load critical scripts first, and (3) enable serverâside compression (gzip) and set appropriate cacheâcontrol headers. I also minified CSS/JS and used a CDN for static assets.
Load time dropped to under 2 seconds, bounce rate improved by 12%, and SEO scores increased.
- How does HTTP/2 affect performance strategies?
- When would you use preconnect vs dnsâprefetch?
- Specific techniques with rationale
- Mention of tooling (Lighthouse, Webpack)
- Quantifiable results
- Vague statements like âmake it fasterâ without concrete methods
- Lazyâload images and nonâcritical resources
- Codeâsplitting & defer/async for JavaScript
- Enable gzip/Brotli compression and proper caching
- Minify CSS/JS and use a CDN
Back-End Development
Our team needed to expose data for a mobile app, and the product manager asked for a clean, scalable API.
Design an API that follows REST conventions.
I outlined the six guiding principles: (1) Use nouns for resources and HTTP methods to indicate actions, (2) Stateless communication where each request contains all necessary information, (3) Use standard HTTP status codes, (4) Provide resource representations in JSON (or XML), (5) Enable HATEOAS links for discoverability, and (6) Version the API via URL or headers. I also emphasized proper naming and pagination for large collections.
The API was intuitive for developers, reduced clientâside errors, and scaled without sessionâstate bottlenecks.
- What are the tradeâoffs of using HATEOAS?
- How would you handle authentication in a stateless API?
- Clear articulation of each principle
- Examples of HTTP methods and status codes
- Mention of versioning and statelessness
- Confusing REST with RPC or GraphQL
- Resources identified by nouns (e.g., /users)
- HTTP verbs map to CRUD operations
- Stateless requests â no serverâside session
- Standard status codes (200, 201, 404, 500)
- JSON as default representation
- HATEOAS for navigation
- Versioning (e.g., /v1/)
A production Express service started returning generic 500 errors, making debugging difficult for the support team.
Implement a robust errorâhandling strategy that provides useful logs while protecting sensitive details from clients.
I created a centralized errorâhandling middleware that captures synchronous and asynchronous errors (using next(err) and async wrappers). I defined custom error classes (e.g., ValidationError, NotFoundError) with appropriate HTTP status codes. I integrated Winston for structured logging and used the âhelmetâ package to hide stack traces in production. For unhandled promise rejections, I added a processâlevel handler to log and gracefully shut down.
Error responses became consistent (e.g., 400 for validation, 404 for missing resources), logs were searchable, and the mean time to resolution dropped by 40%.
- How would you differentiate between clientâside and serverâside errors in responses?
- What is the role of the ânextâ function in Express error handling?
- Understanding of middleware flow
- Use of custom error objects
- Logging strategy
- Security considerations
- Returning raw stack traces to users
- Centralized errorâhandling middleware
- Custom error classes with status codes
- Async wrapper to catch promise rejections
- Structured logging (Winston)
- Hide stack traces in production (Helmet)
- Processâlevel unhandled rejection handler
Behavioral
During a sprint, my team was tasked with delivering a new feature two weeks ahead of a product launch, but an unexpected thirdâparty API change delayed integration.
I needed to communicate the delay, mitigate impact, and adjust the plan to still meet the launch goals.
I immediately informed the product owner, provided a revised timeline, and proposed a temporary fallback UI that used cached data. I coordinated with the API vendor to expedite a fix and reâprioritized internal tasks to focus on the critical integration work. I also documented the incident for future risk assessments.
The product launched on schedule with the fallback UI, and the API issue was resolved within three days. Postâmortem analysis led to adding external dependency monitoring to our sprint planning.
- How do you prioritize tasks when multiple blockers arise?
- What steps do you take to prevent similar delays?
- Transparency and ownership
- Problemâsolving under pressure
- Stakeholder management
- Learning and process improvement
- Blaming others without personal accountability
- Prompt communication of the issue
- Proposed a viable shortâterm solution
- Collaborated with stakeholders to reâprioritize
- Implemented monitoring to prevent recurrence
Our client requested a realâtime dashboard built with React and WebSockets, but my recent experience was limited to vanilla JavaScript and jQuery.
Acquire sufficient React and WebSocket knowledge to deliver a functional prototype within two weeks.
I enrolled in an intensive online React course, followed official documentation, and built a small side project to practice component state and lifecycle. I also read the WebSocket API spec and experimented with a local server. I paired with a senior React developer for code reviews and leveraged community forums for quick answers. I applied the new skills to the dashboard, using functional components and the useEffect hook for socket connections.
The prototype met client expectations, received positive feedback, and the project proceeded to full development. My rapid upskilling also positioned me as the goâto person for future realâtime features.
- How do you assess whether youâve learned enough to start coding?
- What resources do you trust for fast learning?
- Proactive learning approach
- Use of reputable resources
- Collaboration with peers
- Successful delivery
- Vague statements like âI just Googled itâ without depth
- Identify knowledge gap
- Structured learning (courses, docs, side project)
- Seek mentorship and community help
- Apply learning directly to the task
- JavaScript
- React
- Node.js
- REST APIs
- Responsive Design
- CSS Flexbox
- Git